Action, localization and structure-function relationship of growth factors and their receptors in the prostate

S. Chevalier, A. Aprikian, G. Beauregard, I. Defoy, Lt Nguyen, R. Guenette, M. Tenniswood, A. Chapdelaine
{"title":"Action, localization and structure-function relationship of growth factors and their receptors in the prostate","authors":"S. Chevalier, A. Aprikian, G. Beauregard, I. Defoy, Lt Nguyen, R. Guenette, M. Tenniswood, A. Chapdelaine","doi":"10.1017/S0962279900001265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whereas the direct action of sex steroids, namely of androgens, on prostate cell division was questioned as early as in the 1970s, and remains so, the interest in prostatic growth factors (GFs) is rather recent but has expanded tremendously in the last five years. This lag period can be partly explained by the fact that, at the time, androgen receptors had just been discovered, and newly developed hormonal regimens or strategies to treat patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) or epithelioma had generated great enthusiasm and hopes in the medical and scientific community. Another point to consider was the difficulty in maintaining prostate tissues in organ cultures and the relative novelty of culturing prostate epithelial cells in monolayers. Failures of sex steroids to elicit a direct positive response on prostate cell division in vitro , as seen in vivo , were interpreted as resulting from inappropriate models or culture conditions. However, the increasing number of reports confirming the lack of mitogenic activity of sex steroids in vitro , coupled with the powerful mitogenic activity of GFs displayed in other systems, the discovery of GF receptors (GF-Rs), and the elucidation of their signalling pathways showing sex steroid receptors as potential substrates of GF-activated protein kinases gradually led to an increased interest in the putative role of GFs in prostate physiopathology. Of utmost importance was the recognition that hormone refractiveness was responsible for PCa progression, and for the poor outcome of patients with advanced disease under endocrine therapies. This problem remains a major issue and it raises several key questions that need to be solved at the fundamental and clinical levels.","PeriodicalId":329551,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine Review","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962279900001265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Whereas the direct action of sex steroids, namely of androgens, on prostate cell division was questioned as early as in the 1970s, and remains so, the interest in prostatic growth factors (GFs) is rather recent but has expanded tremendously in the last five years. This lag period can be partly explained by the fact that, at the time, androgen receptors had just been discovered, and newly developed hormonal regimens or strategies to treat patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) or epithelioma had generated great enthusiasm and hopes in the medical and scientific community. Another point to consider was the difficulty in maintaining prostate tissues in organ cultures and the relative novelty of culturing prostate epithelial cells in monolayers. Failures of sex steroids to elicit a direct positive response on prostate cell division in vitro , as seen in vivo , were interpreted as resulting from inappropriate models or culture conditions. However, the increasing number of reports confirming the lack of mitogenic activity of sex steroids in vitro , coupled with the powerful mitogenic activity of GFs displayed in other systems, the discovery of GF receptors (GF-Rs), and the elucidation of their signalling pathways showing sex steroid receptors as potential substrates of GF-activated protein kinases gradually led to an increased interest in the putative role of GFs in prostate physiopathology. Of utmost importance was the recognition that hormone refractiveness was responsible for PCa progression, and for the poor outcome of patients with advanced disease under endocrine therapies. This problem remains a major issue and it raises several key questions that need to be solved at the fundamental and clinical levels.
前列腺中生长因子及其受体的作用、定位及结构功能关系
性类固醇,即雄激素,对前列腺细胞分裂的直接作用早在20世纪70年代就受到质疑,至今仍是如此,而对前列腺生长因子(GFs)的兴趣是最近才出现的,但在过去五年中得到了极大的扩展。这种滞后的部分原因是,当时雄激素受体刚刚被发现,治疗前列腺癌(PCa)或上皮瘤患者的新激素疗法或策略在医学界和科学界引起了极大的热情和希望。另一个需要考虑的问题是在器官培养中维持前列腺组织的困难以及在单层中培养前列腺上皮细胞的相对新颖性。性类固醇未能在体外引起前列腺细胞分裂的直接积极反应,正如在体内看到的那样,被解释为是由于不适当的模型或培养条件造成的。然而,越来越多的报道证实性类固醇在体外缺乏有丝分裂活性,再加上GF在其他系统中显示出强大的有丝分裂活性,GF受体(GF- rs)的发现,以及它们的信号通路的阐明,表明性类固醇受体是GF活化蛋白激酶的潜在底物,逐渐导致人们对GF在前列腺生理病理中的作用的兴趣增加。最重要的是认识到激素反射是导致前列腺癌进展的原因,也是晚期患者在内分泌治疗下预后不良的原因。这个问题仍然是一个主要问题,它提出了几个需要在基础和临床层面解决的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信