{"title":"A note on pairs of matrices with product zero","authors":"Charles R. Johnson","doi":"10.6028/JRES.080B.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The independence of YI and Y2 is, in a straightforward way, equivalent toA+B havingeigenvalues Al ... , An, and Theorem I (which was first noted by Craig [3]) is sufficiently fundamental that generally it is now at least stated in advanced texts. For example, a portion of a proof is given in [4]. Apparently in ignorance of [3,4,5], an alternate proof of Theorem I is given in [1]. Our goal is to give a generalization of Theorem I whose proof is quite simple. In addition to including a rat]~er different proof of Theorem I, our observation points out that the symmetry of A and B is not an essential assumption. We recall that the singular values of a general complex matrix A are, by definition, the nonnegative square roots of the eigenvalues of A*A. A good general reference on the singular values decomposition of a matrix is [6].","PeriodicalId":166823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B: Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/JRES.080B.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The independence of YI and Y2 is, in a straightforward way, equivalent toA+B havingeigenvalues Al ... , An, and Theorem I (which was first noted by Craig [3]) is sufficiently fundamental that generally it is now at least stated in advanced texts. For example, a portion of a proof is given in [4]. Apparently in ignorance of [3,4,5], an alternate proof of Theorem I is given in [1]. Our goal is to give a generalization of Theorem I whose proof is quite simple. In addition to including a rat]~er different proof of Theorem I, our observation points out that the symmetry of A and B is not an essential assumption. We recall that the singular values of a general complex matrix A are, by definition, the nonnegative square roots of the eigenvalues of A*A. A good general reference on the singular values decomposition of a matrix is [6].