Theoretical review of interpersonal problems of teacher and students’ interaction

Inessa Harkusha, Andriy Kryzhanovskyi
{"title":"Theoretical review of interpersonal problems of teacher and students’ interaction","authors":"Inessa Harkusha, Andriy Kryzhanovskyi","doi":"10.38014/ehs-ss.2021.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the theoretical problems of interpersonal interaction between teacher and students in higher education institutions.Researchers consider pedagogical communication and relationships in the student academic group as an important prerequisite for pedagogicalmanagement of the educational process in higher education institutions. It is asserted that the term “interrelation” is often used for relationshipsbetween people. It is determined that pedagogical communication is the interaction of the teacher with students and the content is the exchangeof information. It is noted that the interrelations “teacher-student” mean purposeful interaction of subjects of the pedagogical process and aredetermined by general socio-psychological mechanisms, social and role functions of partners and social norms of the institution of higher education. Relationships are distinguished that differ into primary and secondary ones, where it is established that, in contrast to primary relationships, secondary ones (“teacher-student” relationship) are rarely characterized by high emotional involvement and the participants in the relationship can be easily replaced. The three-component model of the mindset is characterized: cognitive (knowledge, understanding by the teacher of the child's inner world), emotional (the teacher's attitude to the student) and behavioral (the choice of means and methods of influence). It is noted that sympathy and antipathy determine the circle of persons with whom contact is maintained in the collective and the assimilation of group norms of behavior is carried out. It has been proven that the enthusiasm for the common cause of students and teachers, friendly disposition, combined with an interest in science, in a future profession, give rise to a joint creative search. The emphasis is made on the fact that every teacher of a higher education institution must constantly analyze his activities, behavior, relationships with colleagues and students.","PeriodicalId":261606,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38014/ehs-ss.2021.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the theoretical problems of interpersonal interaction between teacher and students in higher education institutions.Researchers consider pedagogical communication and relationships in the student academic group as an important prerequisite for pedagogicalmanagement of the educational process in higher education institutions. It is asserted that the term “interrelation” is often used for relationshipsbetween people. It is determined that pedagogical communication is the interaction of the teacher with students and the content is the exchangeof information. It is noted that the interrelations “teacher-student” mean purposeful interaction of subjects of the pedagogical process and aredetermined by general socio-psychological mechanisms, social and role functions of partners and social norms of the institution of higher education. Relationships are distinguished that differ into primary and secondary ones, where it is established that, in contrast to primary relationships, secondary ones (“teacher-student” relationship) are rarely characterized by high emotional involvement and the participants in the relationship can be easily replaced. The three-component model of the mindset is characterized: cognitive (knowledge, understanding by the teacher of the child's inner world), emotional (the teacher's attitude to the student) and behavioral (the choice of means and methods of influence). It is noted that sympathy and antipathy determine the circle of persons with whom contact is maintained in the collective and the assimilation of group norms of behavior is carried out. It has been proven that the enthusiasm for the common cause of students and teachers, friendly disposition, combined with an interest in science, in a future profession, give rise to a joint creative search. The emphasis is made on the fact that every teacher of a higher education institution must constantly analyze his activities, behavior, relationships with colleagues and students.
师生互动人际关系问题的理论述评
本文探讨了高校师生人际交往的理论问题。研究者认为,学生学术群体中的教学交流和教学关系是高校教育过程教学管理的重要前提。有人断言,“相互关系”一词经常用于描述人与人之间的关系。这就确定了教学交流是教师与学生的互动,内容是信息的交换。指出“师生”的相互关系是指教学过程中主体之间有目的的互动,并由一般的社会心理机制、伙伴的社会和角色功能以及高等教育机构的社会规范决定。关系被区分为主要关系和次要关系,与主要关系相比,次要关系(“师生”关系)很少具有高度情感投入的特征,关系中的参与者很容易被替换。心态的三要素模型的特点是:认知(教师对儿童内心世界的认识、理解)、情感(教师对学生的态度)和行为(影响手段和方法的选择)。值得注意的是,同情和反感决定了在集体中与之保持联系的人的圈子,并进行了群体行为规范的同化。事实证明,学生和教师对共同事业的热情,友好的性格,加上对科学和未来职业的兴趣,可以产生共同的创造性探索。强调的是,高等教育机构的每一位教师都必须不断分析自己的活动、行为、与同事和学生的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信