Integrated Formation Evaluation Workflow for Estimating Source Rock Hydrocarbon Potential

{"title":"Integrated Formation Evaluation Workflow for Estimating Source Rock Hydrocarbon Potential","authors":"","doi":"10.29118/ipa22-g-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A complex reservoir usually requires tools and workflow which are beyond conventional formation evaluation techniques. In the case of source rock plays, the complex petrophysics are solved with the addition of advanced logging tools such as NMR for porosity and permeability determination, dielectric for fluid saturation, elemental spectroscopy for identification and quantification of minerals, and core data, ideally pressure core for petrophysical calibration. Formation evaluation for source rocks must be integrated with geochemical analysis to evaluate TOC and/or kerogen, geomechanics analysis to evaluate rock fracability and quantification of faults and natural fractures if present. TOC analysis can be done with standard logging tools with the DeltalogR or Schmoker methods, and the geomechanical analysis can be done with dipole or multipole sonic tools through anisotropy evaluation and elastic properties computations to help quantify areas where fracture conductivity is easier to achieve. Geochemistry and geomechanics log results require high quality core data to calibrate TOC and organic material maturity using pyrolysis or LECO combustion technique and to calibrate elastic properties using triaxial pressure test., Leak Off Test (LOT/XLOT), or microfrac/DFIT. This paper presents a proven workflow and lessons learnt from recent source rock reservoir evaluations using advanced logging tools. The goal of this presentation is to improve understanding on how source rock reservoirs must be evaluated to be completed and commercially produced, such as in emerging Indonesian Source Rock plays.","PeriodicalId":442360,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention & Exhibition, 2022","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention & Exhibition, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29118/ipa22-g-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A complex reservoir usually requires tools and workflow which are beyond conventional formation evaluation techniques. In the case of source rock plays, the complex petrophysics are solved with the addition of advanced logging tools such as NMR for porosity and permeability determination, dielectric for fluid saturation, elemental spectroscopy for identification and quantification of minerals, and core data, ideally pressure core for petrophysical calibration. Formation evaluation for source rocks must be integrated with geochemical analysis to evaluate TOC and/or kerogen, geomechanics analysis to evaluate rock fracability and quantification of faults and natural fractures if present. TOC analysis can be done with standard logging tools with the DeltalogR or Schmoker methods, and the geomechanical analysis can be done with dipole or multipole sonic tools through anisotropy evaluation and elastic properties computations to help quantify areas where fracture conductivity is easier to achieve. Geochemistry and geomechanics log results require high quality core data to calibrate TOC and organic material maturity using pyrolysis or LECO combustion technique and to calibrate elastic properties using triaxial pressure test., Leak Off Test (LOT/XLOT), or microfrac/DFIT. This paper presents a proven workflow and lessons learnt from recent source rock reservoir evaluations using advanced logging tools. The goal of this presentation is to improve understanding on how source rock reservoirs must be evaluated to be completed and commercially produced, such as in emerging Indonesian Source Rock plays.
烃源岩含烃潜力综合评价工作流程
复杂油藏通常需要超越常规地层评价技术的工具和工作流程。对于烃源岩油气藏,复杂的岩石物理问题可以通过添加先进的测井工具来解决,例如用于测定孔隙度和渗透率的核磁共振、用于测定流体饱和度的介电介质、用于鉴定和定量矿物的元素光谱,以及用于岩石物理校准的岩心数据,理想情况下是压力岩心。烃源岩的地层评价必须与地球化学分析(评价TOC和/或干酪根)、地质力学分析(评价岩石可破碎性)以及断层和天然裂缝(如果存在)的量化相结合。TOC分析可以使用DeltalogR或Schmoker方法的标准测井工具进行,地质力学分析可以使用偶极子或多极子声波工具进行各向异性评估和弹性特性计算,以帮助量化更容易获得裂缝导流性的区域。地球化学和地质力学测井结果需要高质量的岩心数据,以便使用热解或LECO燃烧技术校准TOC和有机材料成熟度,并使用三轴压力测试校准弹性性能。,泄漏测试(LOT/XLOT)或微压裂/DFIT。本文介绍了一个经过验证的工作流程,以及最近使用先进测井工具进行烃源岩储层评价的经验教训。本次演讲的目的是提高对烃源岩储层如何评价才能完成和商业生产的理解,例如在印度尼西亚新兴的烃源岩区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信