Study on Efficacy and Safety of Terbinafine Vs. Itraconazole in the Treatment of Tinea Pedis

M. Kabir, Md Abdul Latif Khan, Md. Shirajul Islam Khan, A. Karim, Md. Mustafizur Rahman, A. Jamil
{"title":"Study on Efficacy and Safety of Terbinafine Vs. Itraconazole in the Treatment of Tinea Pedis","authors":"M. Kabir, Md Abdul Latif Khan, Md. Shirajul Islam Khan, A. Karim, Md. Mustafizur Rahman, A. Jamil","doi":"10.3329/taj.v36i1.68302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tinea pedis is a dermatophytosis of the feet usually occurs between the toes with the webspace between the fourth and fifth digits but, in many cases, may appear as an extensive pattern on the bottom and sides of the feet. Terbinafine and itraconazole were evaluated with the efficacy/effectiveness and toxicity in the systemic treatment of Tinea pedis and compared with each other.  Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of terbinafine vs. itraconazole in treating tinea pedis. \nMaterials and Methods: A total of 50 patients were selected, and they were divided into groups (group-A and group B), each of which included 25 patients. Group A was given oral Terbinafine 250 mg daily for two weeks. Group B was given oral Itraconazole 200mg daily for the same duration. Patients were observed for the efficacy and side effects of the trial medicines. A baseline complete blood picture, liver and renal function test, and urine analysis were done and repeated frequently during therapy. \nResults: Most patients were in the fourth decade in both groups, and the male-to-female ratio was almost 4:1. Two groups of people were studied: group-A with terbinafine 250 mg daily and group B with itraconazole 200 mg daily for 14 days. Evaluated weekly during treatment and 02 weeks after cessation of therapy, and finally on 08th week to see the clinical improvement and adverse effects. The clinical response was found in chronic hyperkeratotic type: 08/08, 08/08; chronic interdigital type: 07/07, 07/06; vesico-bullous type: 06/05, 06/05; Mixed type: 04/03, 03/02 in group-A and group-B respectively. On average, 92% clinical improvement was found in group-A and 84% in group B. Most patients had nausea (20.0%) followed by 08% diarrhea in group A. On the other hand, in group B, most patients had nausea (28.0%), followed by 4.0% fatigue and 4.0% diarrhea, and only 01 patient found elevated liver enzyme but did not exceed the upper limit. 80% of patients in the terbinafine group had transient, mild to moderate nausea. \nConclusion: No significant differences in efficacy and toxicity were found between terbinafine and itraconazole groups. Terbinafine may represent a good alternative for treating Tinea Pedis in patients who cannot take itraconazole or other available drugs due to contraindications. \nTAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 75-82","PeriodicalId":373921,"journal":{"name":"TAJ: Journal of Teachers Association","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TAJ: Journal of Teachers Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/taj.v36i1.68302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tinea pedis is a dermatophytosis of the feet usually occurs between the toes with the webspace between the fourth and fifth digits but, in many cases, may appear as an extensive pattern on the bottom and sides of the feet. Terbinafine and itraconazole were evaluated with the efficacy/effectiveness and toxicity in the systemic treatment of Tinea pedis and compared with each other.  Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of terbinafine vs. itraconazole in treating tinea pedis. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients were selected, and they were divided into groups (group-A and group B), each of which included 25 patients. Group A was given oral Terbinafine 250 mg daily for two weeks. Group B was given oral Itraconazole 200mg daily for the same duration. Patients were observed for the efficacy and side effects of the trial medicines. A baseline complete blood picture, liver and renal function test, and urine analysis were done and repeated frequently during therapy. Results: Most patients were in the fourth decade in both groups, and the male-to-female ratio was almost 4:1. Two groups of people were studied: group-A with terbinafine 250 mg daily and group B with itraconazole 200 mg daily for 14 days. Evaluated weekly during treatment and 02 weeks after cessation of therapy, and finally on 08th week to see the clinical improvement and adverse effects. The clinical response was found in chronic hyperkeratotic type: 08/08, 08/08; chronic interdigital type: 07/07, 07/06; vesico-bullous type: 06/05, 06/05; Mixed type: 04/03, 03/02 in group-A and group-B respectively. On average, 92% clinical improvement was found in group-A and 84% in group B. Most patients had nausea (20.0%) followed by 08% diarrhea in group A. On the other hand, in group B, most patients had nausea (28.0%), followed by 4.0% fatigue and 4.0% diarrhea, and only 01 patient found elevated liver enzyme but did not exceed the upper limit. 80% of patients in the terbinafine group had transient, mild to moderate nausea. Conclusion: No significant differences in efficacy and toxicity were found between terbinafine and itraconazole groups. Terbinafine may represent a good alternative for treating Tinea Pedis in patients who cannot take itraconazole or other available drugs due to contraindications. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 75-82
特比萘芬与伊曲康唑治疗足癣的疗效和安全性比较
背景:足癣是一种脚部的皮肤植物病,通常发生在脚趾之间,在第四和第五指之间的网络空间,但在许多情况下,可能出现在脚的底部和两侧的广泛模式。评价特比萘芬与伊曲康唑全身治疗足癣的疗效和毒性,并进行比较。目的:比较特比萘芬与伊曲康唑治疗足癣的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:选择50例患者,分为A组和B组,每组25例。A组患者口服特比萘芬250 mg / d,连用2周。B组患者给予伊曲康唑200mg / d口服,疗程相同。观察试验药物的疗效和副作用。基线全血检查、肝肾功能检查和尿液分析,并在治疗期间频繁重复。结果:两组患者均以40 - 10岁患者居多,男女比例接近4:1。研究对象分为两组:a组每日使用特比萘芬250毫克,B组每日使用伊曲康唑200毫克,连续14天。治疗期间每周评估一次,停药后第02周评估一次,最后于第08周评估临床改善情况及不良反应。临床反应见于慢性角化过度型:08/08、08/08;慢性指间型:07/07、07/06;囊泡型:06/05、06/05;混合型:a组为04/03,b组为03/02。a组和B组的平均临床改善率分别为92%和84%,a组以恶心为主(20.0%),其次为腹泻(08%)。而B组以恶心为主(28.0%),其次为疲劳(4.0%)和腹泻(4.0%),仅有01例患者发现肝酶升高,但未超过上限。特比萘芬组中80%的患者有短暂的轻至中度恶心。结论:特比萘芬组与伊曲康唑组在疗效和毒性方面无显著差异。特比萘芬可能是治疗因禁忌症不能服用伊曲康唑或其他可用药物的足癣患者的一个很好的选择。泰姬酒店2022;36:不,1:75 -82
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信