Democracy and Brexit

M. Kaldor
{"title":"Democracy and Brexit","authors":"M. Kaldor","doi":"10.3898/soun.72.01.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The slogan 'take back control' can be seen as an expression of protest at the hollowing out of democracy. The Brexit referendum has caused many problems, but it has also opened up the possibility for a sense of re-empowerment-the renewed possibility for discussion of 'substantive politics'. The article distinguishes between procedural democracy and substantive democracy-the ability to actually affect decisions. The former is in a relatively healthy state across Europe, the latter is not. The only political position on Brexit that has the potential to assist in the restoring of substantive democracy is the remain and reform position. The 2016 referendum has hugely strengthened the forces of reaction-racism, exclusive nationalism and market fundamentalism-but it has also galvanised a new generation of pro-European green, socialist and democratic activists. This opens up the possibility of restoring a degree of meaningful political participation for individual citizens across the continent, and reversing the sense of disempowerment that led to Brexit.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.72.01.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The slogan 'take back control' can be seen as an expression of protest at the hollowing out of democracy. The Brexit referendum has caused many problems, but it has also opened up the possibility for a sense of re-empowerment-the renewed possibility for discussion of 'substantive politics'. The article distinguishes between procedural democracy and substantive democracy-the ability to actually affect decisions. The former is in a relatively healthy state across Europe, the latter is not. The only political position on Brexit that has the potential to assist in the restoring of substantive democracy is the remain and reform position. The 2016 referendum has hugely strengthened the forces of reaction-racism, exclusive nationalism and market fundamentalism-but it has also galvanised a new generation of pro-European green, socialist and democratic activists. This opens up the possibility of restoring a degree of meaningful political participation for individual citizens across the continent, and reversing the sense of disempowerment that led to Brexit.
民主与英国脱欧
摘要:“收回控制权”的口号可以看作是对民主空心化的抗议表达。英国脱欧公投造成了许多问题,但它也为重新赋权的感觉提供了可能性——重新讨论“实质性政治”的可能性。这篇文章区分了程序性民主和实质性民主——实际影响决策的能力。前者在整个欧洲处于相对健康的状态,后者则不然。在英国退欧问题上,唯一有可能帮助恢复实质民主的政治立场是留欧和改革立场。2016年的公投极大地加强了反动势力——种族主义、排外的民族主义和市场原教旨主义——但它也激发了新一代亲欧绿色、社会主义和民主活动人士。这为整个欧洲大陆的个人公民恢复一定程度的有意义的政治参与提供了可能性,并扭转了导致英国退欧的被剥夺权利的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信