{"title":"On PERSON, animacy, and copular agreement in Czech","authors":"J. Bartošová, I. Kucerova","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198829850.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides novel empirical evidence from agreement in Czech copular clauses that the [+PERSON] feature is dependent on animacy (Adger and Harbour 2007, Nevins 2007, a.o.). The core evidence comes from agreement with φ-feature-deficient pronouns. It is argued that agreement with φ-feature-deficient pronouns yields a Multiple Agree configuration (Hiraiwa 2005). Strikingly, the interpretation of such a pronoun is restricted by all φ-features present in the Multiple Agree chain. Thus if a φ-feature-deficient pronoun with an unvalued PERSON feature enters a Multiple-Agree chain with valued φ-features, including a valued PERSON feature, then the PERSON feature restricts the interpretation of the antecedent of the pronoun. Crucially, this happens only if the pronoun gets valued as [+PERSON]. It is argued that this is because [+PERSON] pronouns have φ-feature valuation restricted by GENDER presuppositions associated with animate referents (Heim 2008, Sudo 2012, a.o.).","PeriodicalId":308902,"journal":{"name":"The Grammar of Copulas Across Languages","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Grammar of Copulas Across Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198829850.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter provides novel empirical evidence from agreement in Czech copular clauses that the [+PERSON] feature is dependent on animacy (Adger and Harbour 2007, Nevins 2007, a.o.). The core evidence comes from agreement with φ-feature-deficient pronouns. It is argued that agreement with φ-feature-deficient pronouns yields a Multiple Agree configuration (Hiraiwa 2005). Strikingly, the interpretation of such a pronoun is restricted by all φ-features present in the Multiple Agree chain. Thus if a φ-feature-deficient pronoun with an unvalued PERSON feature enters a Multiple-Agree chain with valued φ-features, including a valued PERSON feature, then the PERSON feature restricts the interpretation of the antecedent of the pronoun. Crucially, this happens only if the pronoun gets valued as [+PERSON]. It is argued that this is because [+PERSON] pronouns have φ-feature valuation restricted by GENDER presuppositions associated with animate referents (Heim 2008, Sudo 2012, a.o.).