{"title":"Making a Name","authors":"C. Goldin, Maria Shim","doi":"10.3386/W8474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since Lucy Stone decided to retain her surname at marriage in 1855, women in America have tried to do the same. But their numbers were extremely low until the 1970s. The increased age at first marriage, rising numbers with professional degrees and Ph.D.'s, the diffusion of 'the Pill,' state legal decisions, and the acceptance of the appellation 'Ms.,' among other factors, spurred surname retention among married women in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This paper tracks the fraction of college graduate women who kept their surnames upon marriage and after childbirth and explores some of the correlates of surname retention. We use two decades of data from The New York Times and twenty years of information on the Harvard class of 1980. A time series on surname retention at marriage for college graduate women, gleaned from wedding announcements in The New York Times, shows a large increase from 1980 to 1984, a leveling off to 1998, and a possible subsequent increase. About 35 percent kept their surname at marriage in 2001, but fewer than 10 percent did in 1980. Among the women in the Harvard class of 1980, about 52 percent kept their surname at some time after marriage and only a small fraction of this group changed their surname after having children. The observable characteristics of importance in surname retention are those revealing that the bride had already 'made a name' for herself.","PeriodicalId":114523,"journal":{"name":"Labor eJournal","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W8474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Ever since Lucy Stone decided to retain her surname at marriage in 1855, women in America have tried to do the same. But their numbers were extremely low until the 1970s. The increased age at first marriage, rising numbers with professional degrees and Ph.D.'s, the diffusion of 'the Pill,' state legal decisions, and the acceptance of the appellation 'Ms.,' among other factors, spurred surname retention among married women in the late 1970s and early 1980s. This paper tracks the fraction of college graduate women who kept their surnames upon marriage and after childbirth and explores some of the correlates of surname retention. We use two decades of data from The New York Times and twenty years of information on the Harvard class of 1980. A time series on surname retention at marriage for college graduate women, gleaned from wedding announcements in The New York Times, shows a large increase from 1980 to 1984, a leveling off to 1998, and a possible subsequent increase. About 35 percent kept their surname at marriage in 2001, but fewer than 10 percent did in 1980. Among the women in the Harvard class of 1980, about 52 percent kept their surname at some time after marriage and only a small fraction of this group changed their surname after having children. The observable characteristics of importance in surname retention are those revealing that the bride had already 'made a name' for herself.
自从1855年露西·斯通(Lucy Stone)决定在结婚时保留自己的姓氏以来,美国女性就一直在努力这样做。但直到20世纪70年代,它们的数量都非常少。20世纪70年代末和80年代初,初婚年龄的提高、拥有专业学位和博士学位的人数不断增加、“避孕药”的普及、国家法律裁决以及对“女士”称呼的接受等因素促使已婚女性保留了姓氏。本文追踪了大学毕业生女性在结婚和生育后保留姓氏的比例,并探讨了姓氏保留的一些相关因素。我们使用了《纽约时报》20年来的数据和哈佛大学1980届毕业生20年来的信息。从《纽约时报》(New York Times)的婚礼公告中收集到的大学毕业生女性结婚时保留姓氏的时间序列显示,从1980年到1984年,这一比例大幅上升,到1998年趋于平稳,随后可能出现增长。2001年,约35%的人在结婚时保留了自己的姓氏,而在1980年,这一比例不到10%。在哈佛大学1980届的女性中,约52%的人在结婚后的一段时间内保留了自己的姓氏,只有一小部分人在生了孩子后改姓。保留姓氏的重要特征是那些表明新娘已经为自己“出了名”的特征。