Three Serious Mistakes in Einstein’s Original Paper of Special Relativity in 1905

Xiaochun Mei, Canlun Yuan
{"title":"Three Serious Mistakes in Einstein’s Original Paper of Special Relativity in 1905","authors":"Xiaochun Mei, Canlun Yuan","doi":"10.5539/apr.v15n2p80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is revealed in this paper that there were three serious mistakes in the Einstein’s original paper in 1905. Einstein did not prove that the motion equation of classical electromagnetic field could satisfy the invariance of the Lorentz coordinate transformation. The Einstein’s derivations on the formulas of transverse and longitudinal masses, as well as the calculation on the mass-energy relation are wrong. 1. In order to prove that the classical Maxwell electromagnetic field equation satisfied the invariance of Lorentz transformation in free space without charged and current, Einstein introduced the transformations of electromagnetic fields themselves, called the Einstein’s transformations of electromagnetic fields. However, these transformations are completely different from the Lorentz transformations of electromagnetic fields themself, which leads to contradiction and does not hold. 2. For the electromagnetic field equations in non-free space with charge and current, the Einstein’s transformations can not make the electromagnetic fields unchanged under the Lorentz transformation. 3. The constitutive equations of electromagnetic theory in the medium do not satisfy the invariance of the Lorentz transformation too. Therefore, the classical electromagnetic field equations have no the invariance of the Lorentz transformation actually, and the most important theoretical and experimental basis of special relativity do not exist. 4. The Einstein's derivations on the formulas of transverse and longitudinal masses have a series of elementary mistakes in mathematics and physics. Einstein took the relative speed between two reference frames as the arbitrary moving velocity of a particle, and the obtained formulas were completely different from the existing mass-velocity of special relativity. 3. When Einstein derived the mass-energy relationship, he only calculated the work done by the force in the x-axis direction of particle’s motion, ignoring the work done by the force at the y- and z-axes directions. Meanwhile, the constant relative motion velocity between two reference frames was misused as the variable arbitrary velocity of a particle. Therefore, Einstein had not derived the mass-velocity formula and mass-energy relationship used in the present special relativity.","PeriodicalId":174036,"journal":{"name":"Applied Physics research","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Physics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/apr.v15n2p80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is revealed in this paper that there were three serious mistakes in the Einstein’s original paper in 1905. Einstein did not prove that the motion equation of classical electromagnetic field could satisfy the invariance of the Lorentz coordinate transformation. The Einstein’s derivations on the formulas of transverse and longitudinal masses, as well as the calculation on the mass-energy relation are wrong. 1. In order to prove that the classical Maxwell electromagnetic field equation satisfied the invariance of Lorentz transformation in free space without charged and current, Einstein introduced the transformations of electromagnetic fields themselves, called the Einstein’s transformations of electromagnetic fields. However, these transformations are completely different from the Lorentz transformations of electromagnetic fields themself, which leads to contradiction and does not hold. 2. For the electromagnetic field equations in non-free space with charge and current, the Einstein’s transformations can not make the electromagnetic fields unchanged under the Lorentz transformation. 3. The constitutive equations of electromagnetic theory in the medium do not satisfy the invariance of the Lorentz transformation too. Therefore, the classical electromagnetic field equations have no the invariance of the Lorentz transformation actually, and the most important theoretical and experimental basis of special relativity do not exist. 4. The Einstein's derivations on the formulas of transverse and longitudinal masses have a series of elementary mistakes in mathematics and physics. Einstein took the relative speed between two reference frames as the arbitrary moving velocity of a particle, and the obtained formulas were completely different from the existing mass-velocity of special relativity. 3. When Einstein derived the mass-energy relationship, he only calculated the work done by the force in the x-axis direction of particle’s motion, ignoring the work done by the force at the y- and z-axes directions. Meanwhile, the constant relative motion velocity between two reference frames was misused as the variable arbitrary velocity of a particle. Therefore, Einstein had not derived the mass-velocity formula and mass-energy relationship used in the present special relativity.
爱因斯坦1905年狭义相对论原始论文中的三个严重错误
本文揭示了爱因斯坦在1905年发表的原论文中存在的三个严重错误。爱因斯坦没有证明经典电磁场的运动方程能够满足洛伦兹坐标变换的不变性。爱因斯坦对横向质量和纵向质量公式的推导以及质能关系的计算都是错误的。1. 为了证明经典麦克斯韦电磁场方程在没有电荷和电流的自由空间中满足洛伦兹变换的不变性,爱因斯坦引入了电磁场本身的变换,称为爱因斯坦电磁场变换。然而,这些变换与电磁场本身的洛伦兹变换是完全不同的,这就导致了矛盾,是站不住脚的。2. 对于具有电荷和电流的非自由空间中的电磁场方程,爱因斯坦变换不能使电磁场在洛伦兹变换下保持不变。3.介质中电磁理论的本构方程也不满足洛伦兹变换的不变性。因此,经典电磁场方程实际上不具备洛伦兹变换的不变性,狭义相对论最重要的理论和实验基础也不存在。4. 爱因斯坦对横向质量和纵向质量公式的推导存在一系列数学和物理上的基本错误。爱因斯坦将两个参考系之间的相对速度作为粒子的任意运动速度,得到的公式与现有的狭义相对论的质量速度完全不同。3.当爱因斯坦推导质能关系时,他只计算了力在粒子运动的x轴方向上做的功,而忽略了力在y轴和z轴方向上做的功。同时,将两个参考系之间的恒定相对运动速度误用为粒子的可变任意速度。因此,爱因斯坦没有推导出目前狭义相对论中使用的质量-速度公式和质能关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信