Challenges of a Digital Single Market from an Austrian perspective – towards Smart Regulations

P. Egger, Dominik Geringer, Gerwald Gindra-Vady, Christina Gruber, Elisabeth Paar, L. Reiter, Karl Stöger, S. Thalmann
{"title":"Challenges of a Digital Single Market from an Austrian perspective – towards Smart Regulations","authors":"P. Egger, Dominik Geringer, Gerwald Gindra-Vady, Christina Gruber, Elisabeth Paar, L. Reiter, Karl Stöger, S. Thalmann","doi":"10.25364/01.6:2019.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses various legal challenges of the “digitisation of the single market”. The question arises to which extent the current regulatory framework appears suitable to deal with the presented challenges of digitisation and where additional regulation is required. In the field of autonomous decision-making by AI, we identified the most pressing need for new regulation. While the EU (and increasingly Austria, as well) is aware of this need, regulation to date remains scarce. Though the EU legislator has already taken specific precautions for the use of algorithms in the GDPR, such regulatory approaches are missing in most other fields of law. In contrast to this, antitrust law and product liability law already appear to be well suited to meet the challenges posed by digitisation. This is especially true for product liability law, which is in principle apt to cover the specific challenges of the convergence of software and hardware in smart products. However, uncertainty about its applicability to incorporeal goods would make clarification of current product liability legislation advisable – a view shared by the European Commission. Two more fields very recently received some legislative attention due to the changing needs of a digital society: the postal sector on the one hand, and e-government on the other hand. In both fields, new legislation – tellingly in the form of (partially) directly applicable regulations – has recently been passed by the EU – a sharp contrast to the case of self-learning AI. However, while the integration of the new regulation on cross-border parcel delivery will probably not pose major challenges for domestic markets, the implementation of the Single Digital Gateway will raise serious organisational and legal challenges for national administrations (especially when taking into account the limited success of the previous related initiative on the points of single contact under the Services Directive). Fundstelle: Egger, et al, Challenges of a Digital Single Market from an Austrian perspective – towards Smart Regulations, ALJ 2019, 37–53 (http://alj.uni-graz.at/index.php/alj/article/view/132).","PeriodicalId":258698,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Law Journal","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.6:2019.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses various legal challenges of the “digitisation of the single market”. The question arises to which extent the current regulatory framework appears suitable to deal with the presented challenges of digitisation and where additional regulation is required. In the field of autonomous decision-making by AI, we identified the most pressing need for new regulation. While the EU (and increasingly Austria, as well) is aware of this need, regulation to date remains scarce. Though the EU legislator has already taken specific precautions for the use of algorithms in the GDPR, such regulatory approaches are missing in most other fields of law. In contrast to this, antitrust law and product liability law already appear to be well suited to meet the challenges posed by digitisation. This is especially true for product liability law, which is in principle apt to cover the specific challenges of the convergence of software and hardware in smart products. However, uncertainty about its applicability to incorporeal goods would make clarification of current product liability legislation advisable – a view shared by the European Commission. Two more fields very recently received some legislative attention due to the changing needs of a digital society: the postal sector on the one hand, and e-government on the other hand. In both fields, new legislation – tellingly in the form of (partially) directly applicable regulations – has recently been passed by the EU – a sharp contrast to the case of self-learning AI. However, while the integration of the new regulation on cross-border parcel delivery will probably not pose major challenges for domestic markets, the implementation of the Single Digital Gateway will raise serious organisational and legal challenges for national administrations (especially when taking into account the limited success of the previous related initiative on the points of single contact under the Services Directive). Fundstelle: Egger, et al, Challenges of a Digital Single Market from an Austrian perspective – towards Smart Regulations, ALJ 2019, 37–53 (http://alj.uni-graz.at/index.php/alj/article/view/132).
从奥地利的角度看数字单一市场的挑战——走向智能监管
本文讨论了“单一市场数字化”的各种法律挑战。问题是,目前的监管框架在多大程度上适合应对数字化带来的挑战,以及在哪些方面需要额外的监管。在人工智能自主决策领域,我们确定了最迫切需要的新法规。尽管欧盟(以及越来越多的奥地利)意识到了这一需求,但迄今为止,监管仍然很少。尽管欧盟立法者已经对GDPR中算法的使用采取了具体的预防措施,但这种监管方法在大多数其他法律领域都是缺失的。与此形成对比的是,反垄断法和产品责任法似乎已经非常适合应对数字化带来的挑战。对于产品责任法来说尤其如此,它原则上倾向于涵盖智能产品中软件和硬件融合的具体挑战。但是,由于不确定它是否适用于无形货物,因此澄清现行的产品责任立法是可取的- -欧洲委员会也同意这一观点。由于数字社会不断变化的需求,最近又有两个领域受到了立法的关注:一方面是邮政部门,另一方面是电子政务。在这两个领域,欧盟最近通过了新的立法——显然是以(部分)直接适用的法规的形式——这与自主学习的人工智能形成了鲜明对比。然而,虽然跨境包裹递送新法规的整合可能不会对国内市场构成重大挑战,但单一数字网关的实施将给国家管理部门带来严重的组织和法律挑战(特别是考虑到之前在服务指令下的单一联系人方面的相关举措取得的有限成功)。Fundstelle: Egger等人,《从奥地利视角看数字单一市场的挑战——走向智能法规》,ALJ 2019, 37-53 (http://alj.uni-graz.at/index.php/alj/article/view/132)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信