{"title":"Process Profile Thinking of Vocational School Students in Solving the Linear Two Variables Equation System Problem Reviewed From Kinds of Markets","authors":"P. Dyantari, Sutji Rochaminah, Mustamin H. Idris","doi":"10.22487/j25490192.2020.v4.i2.pp77-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was a qualitative research which aims to obtain a description of the profile of the thinking process of vocational high school students in solving the system problems of linear equations in two variables in terms of gender based on Polya's steps. The subjects of this study consisted of male and female students of class X who were capable of high, medium and low. The results shown that (1) when understanding the problem, LT reads the problem. LS is silent, reading slowly. LR read in a clear voice, silent while looking at the question, pointing to the question with a pen and answering doubtfully. PT reads the problem with a clear voice and answers doubtfully. PS reads the whole with a voice, moving the little finger, reading carefully and answering doubtfully. PR pauses while looking at the problem, puts his hand in the cheek, reads the whole question in a voice, and bites the tip of the pen and touches the head with the tip of the pen; (2) during planning, LT look the questions and answer doubtfully. LS reads repeatedly. LR looked at the other direction. PT looked at the question, smiled and answered with a little hesitation. PS answered hesitantly, smiled and covered his face. PR paused for a moment while looking at the problem. (3) when carrying out the planning, LT occasionally looks at the question. LS is silent, muttering a sign remembering a plan. LR writes down what is known for a long time. PT does it right away. PS remembering the previous material; (4) when checking again, LT retraces the work. LS traces the results of his work and writes the proof. LR traced the results. PT sees conclusions from work results. PS and PR retrace the results of their work.","PeriodicalId":373677,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2020.v4.i2.pp77-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research was a qualitative research which aims to obtain a description of the profile of the thinking process of vocational high school students in solving the system problems of linear equations in two variables in terms of gender based on Polya's steps. The subjects of this study consisted of male and female students of class X who were capable of high, medium and low. The results shown that (1) when understanding the problem, LT reads the problem. LS is silent, reading slowly. LR read in a clear voice, silent while looking at the question, pointing to the question with a pen and answering doubtfully. PT reads the problem with a clear voice and answers doubtfully. PS reads the whole with a voice, moving the little finger, reading carefully and answering doubtfully. PR pauses while looking at the problem, puts his hand in the cheek, reads the whole question in a voice, and bites the tip of the pen and touches the head with the tip of the pen; (2) during planning, LT look the questions and answer doubtfully. LS reads repeatedly. LR looked at the other direction. PT looked at the question, smiled and answered with a little hesitation. PS answered hesitantly, smiled and covered his face. PR paused for a moment while looking at the problem. (3) when carrying out the planning, LT occasionally looks at the question. LS is silent, muttering a sign remembering a plan. LR writes down what is known for a long time. PT does it right away. PS remembering the previous material; (4) when checking again, LT retraces the work. LS traces the results of his work and writes the proof. LR traced the results. PT sees conclusions from work results. PS and PR retrace the results of their work.