Laughter as the Best Medicine: Coping with the Nigerian Tragicomedy

Moses Khisa, Paul D. Williams
{"title":"Laughter as the Best Medicine: Coping with the Nigerian Tragicomedy","authors":"Moses Khisa, Paul D. Williams","doi":"10.57054/arb.v14i1.4836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil society has been defined as a realm of social interaction between economy and the state, made up above all of the personal sphere (particularly the family), the field of associations (principally voluntary organisations), social movements, and types of public communications. It has also been described as the area of social association in society as distinct fromthe state, involving networks of bodies through which society and groups within society speak for themselves in cultural, ideological and political ways. Civil society is within the superstructure, and is related to institutions, forms of consciousness and political and cultural practices. With regard to Africa, there has been a debate about the applicability of the civil society concept to the continent. The negation of its applicability is usually based on the idea that the mostobvious prerequisites for a Western-type civil society (such as a self-confident urban citizenry that has previously achieved some degree of autonomy from the state) are typically missing. That this narrow Eurocentric definition has beenassumed by many illustrates the poverty of mainstream African studies. That conventional Western scholars base theirstudy of Africa on the European experience and on how processes match up (or do not) with their societies, has long beenproblematic, particularly as these are often the gatekeepers of African studies in the West.","PeriodicalId":170362,"journal":{"name":"Africa Review of Books","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Review of Books","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/arb.v14i1.4836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civil society has been defined as a realm of social interaction between economy and the state, made up above all of the personal sphere (particularly the family), the field of associations (principally voluntary organisations), social movements, and types of public communications. It has also been described as the area of social association in society as distinct fromthe state, involving networks of bodies through which society and groups within society speak for themselves in cultural, ideological and political ways. Civil society is within the superstructure, and is related to institutions, forms of consciousness and political and cultural practices. With regard to Africa, there has been a debate about the applicability of the civil society concept to the continent. The negation of its applicability is usually based on the idea that the mostobvious prerequisites for a Western-type civil society (such as a self-confident urban citizenry that has previously achieved some degree of autonomy from the state) are typically missing. That this narrow Eurocentric definition has beenassumed by many illustrates the poverty of mainstream African studies. That conventional Western scholars base theirstudy of Africa on the European experience and on how processes match up (or do not) with their societies, has long beenproblematic, particularly as these are often the gatekeepers of African studies in the West.
笑声是最好的良药:应对尼日利亚的悲喜剧
公民社会被定义为经济和国家之间的社会互动领域,主要由个人领域(特别是家庭)、协会领域(主要是志愿组织)、社会运动和各种公共交流组成。它也被描述为社会中不同于国家的社会联合领域,涉及社会和社会内部团体以文化、意识形态和政治方式为自己说话的团体网络。市民社会位于上层建筑之内,与制度、意识形态以及政治和文化实践有关。关于非洲,就文明社会概念是否适用于该大陆进行了辩论。对其适用性的否定通常是基于这样一种观点,即西方式公民社会最明显的先决条件(比如自信的城市公民,他们之前已经从国家获得了一定程度的自治权)通常是缺失的。这种狭隘的以欧洲为中心的定义被许多人所接受,说明了主流非洲研究的贫乏。传统的西方学者将他们对非洲的研究建立在欧洲的经验以及进程如何与他们的社会相匹配(或不相匹配)的基础上,这长期以来一直存在问题,特别是因为这些学者往往是西方非洲研究的守门人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信