An Improved Model for Accurate Description of Drilling Fluid Rheological Behaviour in Enhanced-Water and Low-Toxicity Oil-Based Muds

Folayan Adewale Johnson, A. Dosunmu, O. Boniface
{"title":"An Improved Model for Accurate Description of Drilling Fluid Rheological Behaviour in Enhanced-Water and Low-Toxicity Oil-Based Muds","authors":"Folayan Adewale Johnson, A. Dosunmu, O. Boniface","doi":"10.2118/217171-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, a new rheological model was developed by the introduction of dimensionless plastic viscosity and shear rate correction factors (k and n) respectively to the plastic viscosity stress-term of the Bingham plastic rheological model with a view to correcting the under-estimation errors that are associated with the model at high shear rate condition in the pipe. Similarly, an effective yield stress τeff was also incorporated into the model to correctly describe the resistance to flow at low shear rate condition in the annulus by taking into account the effect of lowest shear rate stress on the yield-stress term of the model. The drilling fluid matrix consists of a low toxicity oil-based mud (LTOBM) and a high-performance, nanoparticle-enhanced water-based mud (EWBM). The rheological characteristics of these muds were evaluated at temperatures of 30°C, 60°C and 120°C and pressures of 14.7psi, 2500psi and 5000psi respectively. The experiments were conducted under API recommended standard equipment and procedures. Also, statistical tools were employed to quantify the degree of deviation of the model from experimental values.\n Empirical results of the new model comparative rheological performance analysis with different existing models that are commonly used in the oil industries showed that the developed model accurately predicts fluid rheology better than the Bingham plastic model at both high and low shear rates conditions in the LTOBM and EWBM at all tested temperatures and pressures. The new model performed better than the Bingham plastic and the power law models at 30°C and 14.7psi for the EWBM with lowest standard error deviation of 1.5096 as against 4.4392 and 2.2573 for BPRM and PLRM respectively. Similarly, the average absolute error of the new model for EWBM at 30°C and 14.7psia is 1.6874 unlike BPRM and PLRM with (EAA) values of 5.3249 and 2.8704 respectively. The new model is not significantly temperature and pressure dependent at high shear rate.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217171-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a new rheological model was developed by the introduction of dimensionless plastic viscosity and shear rate correction factors (k and n) respectively to the plastic viscosity stress-term of the Bingham plastic rheological model with a view to correcting the under-estimation errors that are associated with the model at high shear rate condition in the pipe. Similarly, an effective yield stress τeff was also incorporated into the model to correctly describe the resistance to flow at low shear rate condition in the annulus by taking into account the effect of lowest shear rate stress on the yield-stress term of the model. The drilling fluid matrix consists of a low toxicity oil-based mud (LTOBM) and a high-performance, nanoparticle-enhanced water-based mud (EWBM). The rheological characteristics of these muds were evaluated at temperatures of 30°C, 60°C and 120°C and pressures of 14.7psi, 2500psi and 5000psi respectively. The experiments were conducted under API recommended standard equipment and procedures. Also, statistical tools were employed to quantify the degree of deviation of the model from experimental values. Empirical results of the new model comparative rheological performance analysis with different existing models that are commonly used in the oil industries showed that the developed model accurately predicts fluid rheology better than the Bingham plastic model at both high and low shear rates conditions in the LTOBM and EWBM at all tested temperatures and pressures. The new model performed better than the Bingham plastic and the power law models at 30°C and 14.7psi for the EWBM with lowest standard error deviation of 1.5096 as against 4.4392 and 2.2573 for BPRM and PLRM respectively. Similarly, the average absolute error of the new model for EWBM at 30°C and 14.7psia is 1.6874 unlike BPRM and PLRM with (EAA) values of 5.3249 and 2.8704 respectively. The new model is not significantly temperature and pressure dependent at high shear rate.
一种精确描述增强水基和低毒油基泥浆中钻井液流变特性的改进模型
本文通过在Bingham塑性流变模型的塑性黏度应力项中分别引入无因次塑性黏度修正因子k和剪切速率修正因子n,建立了一种新的流变模型,以修正该模型在管道高剪切速率条件下的低估误差。同样,考虑到最低剪切速率应力对模型屈服应力项的影响,在模型中也加入了有效屈服应力τeff,以正确描述环空低剪切速率条件下的流动阻力。钻井液基质由低毒性油基泥浆(LTOBM)和高性能纳米颗粒增强水基泥浆(EWBM)组成。在温度为30°C、60°C和120°C,压力分别为14.7psi、2500psi和5000psi的情况下,对这些泥浆的流变特性进行了评估。实验在API推荐的标准设备和程序下进行。此外,采用统计工具来量化模型与实验值的偏差程度。将新模型与石油工业中常用的不同现有模型进行流变性能对比分析的经验结果表明,在所测试的温度和压力下,无论在高剪切速率条件下还是在低剪切速率条件下,所开发的模型都比Bingham塑性模型更准确地预测了LTOBM和EWBM中的流体流变。新模型在30°C和14.7psi下的EWBM性能优于Bingham塑料模型和幂律模型,最低标准误差为1.5096,而BPRM和PLRM分别为4.4392和2.2573。同样,在30°C和14.7psia下,新模型EWBM的平均绝对误差为1.6874,而BPRM和PLRM的(EAA)分别为5.3249和2.8704。新模型在高剪切速率下不明显依赖于温度和压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信