A Comparative Analytical Structural Study between Box-Jenkins Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Technology Applied to Cancer Patients in Gaza Governorates for the Period (2009-2018)

Sharif Musleh
{"title":"A Comparative Analytical Structural Study between Box-Jenkins Methodology and Artificial Neural Network Technology Applied to Cancer Patients in Gaza Governorates for the Period (2009-2018)","authors":"Sharif Musleh","doi":"10.52865/iikl2509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research used two approaches to analyzing of time series data. The two methods aimed at comparing the Box and Jenkins model to the Artificial Neural Networks method )ANN(, by studying and analyzing time series data as an indicator of cancer cases reported in Gaza Strip governorates during the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018. The estimated models were compared using five statistical evaluation criteria such as MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE. The research found that the optimal model for data representation among ARIMA models is ARIMA (2,2,2). This model was selected based on basic statistical criteria, the most significant one was using of the Akaike Information Criterion )ِAIC). While when using the ANN method, the optimal model was reached through some functions and commands by the input and output of variables. The number of hidden neurons and the number of gaps were selected by using the method of trial and error. The study concluded that the analysis of cancer patient's data reflected the superiority of the ANN neural network model compared to the ARIMA time series models.","PeriodicalId":223912,"journal":{"name":"Israa University Journal for Applied Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israa University Journal for Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52865/iikl2509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research used two approaches to analyzing of time series data. The two methods aimed at comparing the Box and Jenkins model to the Artificial Neural Networks method )ANN(, by studying and analyzing time series data as an indicator of cancer cases reported in Gaza Strip governorates during the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018. The estimated models were compared using five statistical evaluation criteria such as MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE. The research found that the optimal model for data representation among ARIMA models is ARIMA (2,2,2). This model was selected based on basic statistical criteria, the most significant one was using of the Akaike Information Criterion )ِAIC). While when using the ANN method, the optimal model was reached through some functions and commands by the input and output of variables. The number of hidden neurons and the number of gaps were selected by using the method of trial and error. The study concluded that the analysis of cancer patient's data reflected the superiority of the ANN neural network model compared to the ARIMA time series models.
2009-2018年加沙省癌症患者Box-Jenkins方法与人工神经网络技术对比分析结构研究
本研究采用两种方法对时间序列数据进行分析。这两种方法旨在通过研究和分析时间序列数据,将2009年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间加沙地带各省报告的癌症病例作为指标,将Box和Jenkins模型与人工神经网络方法进行比较。采用MAE、MSE、RMSE、MAPE等5个统计评价标准对估计模型进行比较。研究发现,ARIMA模型中数据表示的最优模型为ARIMA(2,2,2)。该模型的选择基于基本的统计标准,其中最重要的是使用了赤池信息标准(ِAIC)。而在使用人工神经网络方法时,通过一些函数和命令,通过变量的输入和输出来达到最优模型。采用试错法选择隐藏神经元个数和间隙个数。研究得出结论,对癌症患者数据的分析反映了ANN神经网络模型相对于ARIMA时间序列模型的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信