What happens with a proportional fair cellular scheduling when D2D communications underlay a cellular network?

Rodrigo L. Batista, Carlos F. M. Silva, J. M. B. D. Silva, T. Maciel, F. Cavalcanti
{"title":"What happens with a proportional fair cellular scheduling when D2D communications underlay a cellular network?","authors":"Rodrigo L. Batista, Carlos F. M. Silva, J. M. B. D. Silva, T. Maciel, F. Cavalcanti","doi":"10.1109/WCNCW.2014.6934896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Device-to-Device (D2D) communications are seen as promising technology for future wireless systems. However, while underlying cellular networks they can negatively affect the performance of cellular communications when intra-cell spectrum sharing is enabled. The impact of D2D communications is not only seen on the cellular throughput, but also on the decision-making of the cellular scheduling policy. In this paper, we provide an impact assessment of D2D communications on the performance of Proportional Fair (PF) scheduling for a Long Term Evolution (LTE) multi-cell scenario through system-level simulations. Results show that due to excessive interference generated by D2D communications and depending on the accuracy of the link quality measure used to estimate the instantaneous data rate, a PF cellular scheduling policy may get stuck in an infinite loop and continuously selects the same User Equipments (UEs), which reduces the cellular throughput, or even approaches the performance of a Maximum Rate (MR)-based policy, thus affecting service coverage and fairness.","PeriodicalId":425676,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW)","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNCW.2014.6934896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Device-to-Device (D2D) communications are seen as promising technology for future wireless systems. However, while underlying cellular networks they can negatively affect the performance of cellular communications when intra-cell spectrum sharing is enabled. The impact of D2D communications is not only seen on the cellular throughput, but also on the decision-making of the cellular scheduling policy. In this paper, we provide an impact assessment of D2D communications on the performance of Proportional Fair (PF) scheduling for a Long Term Evolution (LTE) multi-cell scenario through system-level simulations. Results show that due to excessive interference generated by D2D communications and depending on the accuracy of the link quality measure used to estimate the instantaneous data rate, a PF cellular scheduling policy may get stuck in an infinite loop and continuously selects the same User Equipments (UEs), which reduces the cellular throughput, or even approaches the performance of a Maximum Rate (MR)-based policy, thus affecting service coverage and fairness.
当D2D通信基于蜂窝网络时,比例公平蜂窝调度会发生什么?
设备到设备(D2D)通信被视为未来无线系统的一项有前途的技术。然而,当启用小区内频谱共享时,虽然底层蜂窝网络可能会对蜂窝通信的性能产生负面影响。D2D通信不仅影响蜂窝吞吐量,而且影响蜂窝调度策略的制定。在本文中,我们通过系统级模拟提供了D2D通信对长期演进(LTE)多小区场景中比例公平(PF)调度性能的影响评估。结果表明,由于D2D通信产生的过多干扰和用于估计瞬时数据速率的链路质量度量的准确性,PF蜂窝调度策略可能陷入无限循环并不断选择相同的用户设备(ue),从而降低蜂窝吞吐量,甚至接近基于最大速率(MR)的策略的性能,从而影响服务覆盖和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书