Sharing and securing learners’ performance standards across schools

R. Kimbell
{"title":"Sharing and securing learners’ performance standards across schools","authors":"R. Kimbell","doi":"10.37517/978-1-74286-685-7-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing learners’ performance makes very different demands upon teachers depending on the purpose and the context of the assessment. But common to all assessment is some sense of what ‘quality’ looks like. Most often teachers engage in formative assessments in the classroom, and the familiar standards of the classroom are adequate for this purpose. However if teachers are to undertake external, nationally regulated assessment then some sense of a national standard of quality is required. But there are very limited mechanisms by which teachers can acquire this understanding, so they use their best judgement, and standards vary from school to school not because anyone is attempting to cheat the system but simply because they cannot know what the real national standard is. It is for this reason that regulated examination bodies follow some process such as the following from the State Examinations Commission (SEC) in Ireland. ‘… teacher estimated marks will be subjected to an in-school alignment process and later a national standardisation process’. (SEC, 2021). How much simpler it would all be if teachers had – as a matter of normal practice – access to, and familiarity with, work from a national sample of schools, not just their own classroom. Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) is an online assessment tool that has been used for some years, principally as a formative tool for learners (e.g. Bartholomew et al., 2018; 2019). This presentation reports on a study of the new ACJ Steady State tool from the same stable. The purpose of the new tool is to solve the problem of variable standards across schools by enabling teachers to make paired judgements of work from multiple schools and thereby evolve and agree standards of performance beyond their own school. The current study is operating in Ireland with a group of schools, a university, and the SEC. The anticipated outcomes include 1) better consistency of performance standards across schools in the research group and 2) greater understanding of and confidence in assessment judgements by the teachers. If ACJ has proved to be a powerful formative assessment tool for learners, ACJ Steady State is designed to be a formative assessment tool for teachers, helping to inform and support their assessment judgements.","PeriodicalId":191950,"journal":{"name":"Research Conference 2022: Reimagining assessment: Proceedings and program","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Conference 2022: Reimagining assessment: Proceedings and program","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-685-7-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing learners’ performance makes very different demands upon teachers depending on the purpose and the context of the assessment. But common to all assessment is some sense of what ‘quality’ looks like. Most often teachers engage in formative assessments in the classroom, and the familiar standards of the classroom are adequate for this purpose. However if teachers are to undertake external, nationally regulated assessment then some sense of a national standard of quality is required. But there are very limited mechanisms by which teachers can acquire this understanding, so they use their best judgement, and standards vary from school to school not because anyone is attempting to cheat the system but simply because they cannot know what the real national standard is. It is for this reason that regulated examination bodies follow some process such as the following from the State Examinations Commission (SEC) in Ireland. ‘… teacher estimated marks will be subjected to an in-school alignment process and later a national standardisation process’. (SEC, 2021). How much simpler it would all be if teachers had – as a matter of normal practice – access to, and familiarity with, work from a national sample of schools, not just their own classroom. Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) is an online assessment tool that has been used for some years, principally as a formative tool for learners (e.g. Bartholomew et al., 2018; 2019). This presentation reports on a study of the new ACJ Steady State tool from the same stable. The purpose of the new tool is to solve the problem of variable standards across schools by enabling teachers to make paired judgements of work from multiple schools and thereby evolve and agree standards of performance beyond their own school. The current study is operating in Ireland with a group of schools, a university, and the SEC. The anticipated outcomes include 1) better consistency of performance standards across schools in the research group and 2) greater understanding of and confidence in assessment judgements by the teachers. If ACJ has proved to be a powerful formative assessment tool for learners, ACJ Steady State is designed to be a formative assessment tool for teachers, helping to inform and support their assessment judgements.
在各学校之间共享和确保学习者的表现标准
根据评估的目的和背景,评估学习者的表现对教师提出了非常不同的要求。但所有评估的共同点是对“质量”的某种感觉。大多数情况下,教师在课堂上进行形成性评估,熟悉的课堂标准足以满足这一目的。然而,如果教师要进行外部的、国家监管的评估,那么就需要某种意义上的国家质量标准。但是,教师获得这种理解的机制非常有限,因此他们只能做出最好的判断。不同学校的标准不同,不是因为有人试图欺骗教育体系,而是因为他们不知道真正的国家标准是什么。正是出于这个原因,受监管的考试机构遵循一些流程,例如爱尔兰国家考试委员会(SEC)的以下流程。“老师们的预估分数将经过学校内部的调整过程,然后是全国标准化过程。”(SEC, 2021)。如果教师们——作为一种正常的做法——能够接触并熟悉全国范围内的学校样本,而不仅仅是他们自己的课堂,那一切将会简单得多。适应性比较判断(ACJ)是一种已经使用了多年的在线评估工具,主要作为学习者的形成工具(例如Bartholomew等人,2018;2019)。本报告报告了来自同一稳定的新ACJ稳态工具的研究。新工具的目的是通过使教师能够对来自多所学校的工作进行配对判断,从而发展和同意超出自己学校的表现标准,从而解决学校之间标准可变的问题。目前的研究正在爱尔兰与一组学校、一所大学和SEC合作进行。预期的结果包括:1)研究小组中各学校的绩效标准更加一致;2)对教师的评估判断有更大的理解和信心。如果ACJ已被证明是学习者强有力的形成性评估工具,那么ACJ稳态则被设计为教师的形成性评估工具,帮助他们了解和支持他们的评估判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信