Objective and Subjective Metrics Meant for Evaluating Quality of Social Web Applications

T. Orehovački
{"title":"Objective and Subjective Metrics Meant for Evaluating Quality of Social Web Applications","authors":"T. Orehovački","doi":"10.1145/3328833.3328852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lifetime of majority social Web applications is very short and it is common that developers change their purpose, abandon or terminate project when they realize that it has not met users' expectations. We strongly believe this is due to the lack of suitable methodologies, models, and measuring instruments meant for monitoring and examining quality of social Web applications during their life cycle. To address this issue, we initiated a research on development of a comprehensive methodology that would enable evaluation of both pragmatic and hedonic facets of quality with respect to social Web applications and facilitate their comparison at all levels in the quality model. The work this paper is dealing with presents one of the essential parts of the aforementioned methodology. After establishing the quality model in the form of the requirement tree, objective and subjective metrics in the form of performance variables were introduced. To wrap things up, we proposed elementary criteria defined as preference scales and on the example of two types of social Web applications we illustrated how elementary preference score related to estimated and perceived facets of quality can be determined.","PeriodicalId":172646,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328833.3328852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lifetime of majority social Web applications is very short and it is common that developers change their purpose, abandon or terminate project when they realize that it has not met users' expectations. We strongly believe this is due to the lack of suitable methodologies, models, and measuring instruments meant for monitoring and examining quality of social Web applications during their life cycle. To address this issue, we initiated a research on development of a comprehensive methodology that would enable evaluation of both pragmatic and hedonic facets of quality with respect to social Web applications and facilitate their comparison at all levels in the quality model. The work this paper is dealing with presents one of the essential parts of the aforementioned methodology. After establishing the quality model in the form of the requirement tree, objective and subjective metrics in the form of performance variables were introduced. To wrap things up, we proposed elementary criteria defined as preference scales and on the example of two types of social Web applications we illustrated how elementary preference score related to estimated and perceived facets of quality can be determined.
用于评估社交网络应用质量的客观和主观度量
大多数社交Web应用程序的生命周期都很短,当开发人员意识到它没有达到用户的期望时,他们通常会改变目标,放弃或终止项目。我们坚信这是由于缺乏合适的方法、模型和测量工具来监视和检查社交Web应用程序在其生命周期中的质量。为了解决这个问题,我们发起了一项研究,开发一种综合的方法,可以对社交网络应用程序的质量的实用和享乐方面进行评估,并促进它们在质量模型的各个层次上的比较。本文所处理的工作是上述方法的重要组成部分之一。在以需求树的形式建立质量模型后,引入了以性能变量的形式表现的客观度量和主观度量。最后,我们提出了定义为偏好尺度的基本标准,并以两种类型的社交Web应用程序为例说明了如何确定与质量的估计和感知方面相关的基本偏好得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信