Corrective control strategies in case of infeasible operating situations

A.G.C. Conceicao, C. Castro
{"title":"Corrective control strategies in case of infeasible operating situations","authors":"A.G.C. Conceicao, C. Castro","doi":"10.1109/PESS.2001.970186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new method that deals with power systems infeasible operating situations is proposed in this paper. In case these situations occur, appropriate corrective actions must be efficiently obtained and quickly implemented. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary (a) to quantify the systems unsolvability degree (UD), and (b) to determine a corrective control strategy to pull the system back into the feasible operation region. UD is determined through the smallest distance between the infeasible (unstable) operating point and the feasibility boundary in parameter (load) space. In this paper the control strategies can be obtained by two methods, namely the proportionality method (PM) and the nonlinear programming based method (NLPM). Capacitor banks, tap changing transformers and load shedding are the usual controls available. Simulations have been carried out, for small to large systems, under contingency and heavy load situations, in order to show the efficiency of the proposed method. It can be a very useful tool in operation planning studies, particularly in voltage stability analysis.","PeriodicalId":273578,"journal":{"name":"2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESS.2001.970186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A new method that deals with power systems infeasible operating situations is proposed in this paper. In case these situations occur, appropriate corrective actions must be efficiently obtained and quickly implemented. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary (a) to quantify the systems unsolvability degree (UD), and (b) to determine a corrective control strategy to pull the system back into the feasible operation region. UD is determined through the smallest distance between the infeasible (unstable) operating point and the feasibility boundary in parameter (load) space. In this paper the control strategies can be obtained by two methods, namely the proportionality method (PM) and the nonlinear programming based method (NLPM). Capacitor banks, tap changing transformers and load shedding are the usual controls available. Simulations have been carried out, for small to large systems, under contingency and heavy load situations, in order to show the efficiency of the proposed method. It can be a very useful tool in operation planning studies, particularly in voltage stability analysis.
在不可行的操作情况下的纠正控制策略
本文提出了一种处理电力系统不可行运行情况的新方法。如果发生这些情况,必须有效地获得适当的纠正措施并迅速实施。为此,有必要(a)量化系统的不可解度(UD), (b)确定纠正控制策略,将系统拉回到可行的运行区域。通过参数(负荷)空间中不可行(不稳定)工作点与可行边界之间的最小距离确定UD。本文采用比例法(PM)和基于非线性规划的方法(NLPM)两种方法获得控制策略。电容器组,分接变换变压器和负载脱落是通常可用的控制。为了证明所提出方法的有效性,在偶然性和重载情况下,对小型到大型系统进行了仿真。它在运行计划研究中是一个非常有用的工具,特别是在电压稳定性分析中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信