Influence of Residual Allelopathic Effects of the Seed Powder of Watercress or Mustard on the Following Cowpea Plant and Its Associated Weeds

M. El-Dabaa, S. E. A. Ahmed, N. Messiha, -. EbrahimR.El, Desoki, R. El-Masry
{"title":"Influence of Residual Allelopathic Effects of the Seed Powder of Watercress or\nMustard on the Following Cowpea Plant and Its Associated Weeds","authors":"M. El-Dabaa, S. E. A. Ahmed, N. Messiha, -. EbrahimR.El, Desoki, R. El-Masry","doi":"10.36632/mejar/2021.10.2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) plants were sown in the same pots after the harvest of tomato plants which were previously treated with different rates (5, 10, 15, 30 and 45g/kg soil) of seed powder of two Brassicaceae plants, watercress (Eruca Sativa M.) or mustard (Sinapis alba L.) compared to those treated with Basamid herbicide at 0.2 g/pot. This work was done in the greenhouse of the Egyptian National Research Centre during the two successive summer seasons of 2017 and 2018. The obtained results indicated that all previous treatments used to tomato were significantly minimized the weight (fresh and dry) of grasses, broad-leaved and the total weeds associated with the following cowpea plants, at 45 and 85 days after sowing (DAS). Generally, all treatments with watercress were more effective than mustard in controlling both broad leaved weeds and grasses. Moreover, broad leaved weeds were more susceptible than grasses. The results also showed that all mentioned treatments had significant effect on cowpea plants, significantly increasing most growth parameters and yield and yield components. The results indicated that all tested treatments had no toxic effects on the following cowpea plants.","PeriodicalId":346845,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36632/mejar/2021.10.2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) plants were sown in the same pots after the harvest of tomato plants which were previously treated with different rates (5, 10, 15, 30 and 45g/kg soil) of seed powder of two Brassicaceae plants, watercress (Eruca Sativa M.) or mustard (Sinapis alba L.) compared to those treated with Basamid herbicide at 0.2 g/pot. This work was done in the greenhouse of the Egyptian National Research Centre during the two successive summer seasons of 2017 and 2018. The obtained results indicated that all previous treatments used to tomato were significantly minimized the weight (fresh and dry) of grasses, broad-leaved and the total weeds associated with the following cowpea plants, at 45 and 85 days after sowing (DAS). Generally, all treatments with watercress were more effective than mustard in controlling both broad leaved weeds and grasses. Moreover, broad leaved weeds were more susceptible than grasses. The results also showed that all mentioned treatments had significant effect on cowpea plants, significantly increasing most growth parameters and yield and yield components. The results indicated that all tested treatments had no toxic effects on the following cowpea plants.
豆瓣菜和芥菜种粉残留化感作用对后续豇豆及其伴生杂草的影响
豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)在收获番茄植株后,分别用不同剂量(5、10、15、30和45g/kg土壤)处理豆瓣菜(Eruca Sativa M.)或芥菜(Sinapis alba L.)两种芸苔科植物的种子粉,与用0.2 g/kg Basamid除草剂处理的番茄植株进行对照,在同一花盆中播种。这项工作是在2017年和2018年连续两个夏季在埃及国家研究中心的温室中完成的。结果表明,在播种后45和85 d,所有番茄处理均显著降低了与豇豆植株相关的禾草、阔叶和总杂草的重量(鲜重和干重)。总的来说,豆瓣菜处理对阔叶杂草和禾本科杂草的防治效果均优于芥菜处理。此外,阔叶杂草比禾本科更容易感染。结果还表明,上述处理对豇豆植株均有显著影响,显著提高了大部分生长参数和产量及产量成分。结果表明,所有试验处理对下列豇豆植株均无毒性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信