Typical Causes of Errors During Measuring Luminance Distributions in Relation to Glare Calculations

S. Słomiński
{"title":"Typical Causes of Errors During Measuring Luminance Distributions in Relation to Glare Calculations","authors":"S. Słomiński","doi":"10.1109/LUMENV.2018.8521136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of high luminance light sources commonly used in lighting technology is systematically growing, causing an increase in number of potential problems. One of them is the problem of discomfort glare and ways to measure it. Both calculation and measurement methods connected with this parameter have a series of disadvantages and advantages. Among the serious disadvantages, there can be dominant digital “models” of light sources and luminaires, which do not include, practically, any direct information on luminance distribution. To make the measurement results correspond to the calculation results, computer simulations and visual impression of the people assessing the lighting, the measuring devices should correctly record the analyzed parameters. The accurate parameters recording means the situation under which the measurement result is possibly close to what the human eye records. The modern measurement systems, among which there are undoubtedly ILMDs - Imaging luminance measuring devices, are potentially ideal to record all parameters used to calculate glare. Research done by the author proves that especially as far as the small light sources are concerned, such as LEDs and multi-source luminaire systems the parameters of the equipment used have a big influence on the measurement results. Especially, an angular field of view of single pixel of the digital sensor, which relates to a CCD or CMOS sensor size, dimensions of single photo-cell, focal length and technology that is used to make this device (B/W, color). A problem of the influence of depth of field of digital recording equipment with respect to the measured luminance values was dealt with. In this paper and presentation, the relationships of ILMD parameters, such as a field of view of a given type of sensor and single photo-element, including the used lens, will be presented.","PeriodicalId":389317,"journal":{"name":"2018 VII. Lighting Conference of the Visegrad Countries (Lumen V4)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 VII. Lighting Conference of the Visegrad Countries (Lumen V4)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LUMENV.2018.8521136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The number of high luminance light sources commonly used in lighting technology is systematically growing, causing an increase in number of potential problems. One of them is the problem of discomfort glare and ways to measure it. Both calculation and measurement methods connected with this parameter have a series of disadvantages and advantages. Among the serious disadvantages, there can be dominant digital “models” of light sources and luminaires, which do not include, practically, any direct information on luminance distribution. To make the measurement results correspond to the calculation results, computer simulations and visual impression of the people assessing the lighting, the measuring devices should correctly record the analyzed parameters. The accurate parameters recording means the situation under which the measurement result is possibly close to what the human eye records. The modern measurement systems, among which there are undoubtedly ILMDs - Imaging luminance measuring devices, are potentially ideal to record all parameters used to calculate glare. Research done by the author proves that especially as far as the small light sources are concerned, such as LEDs and multi-source luminaire systems the parameters of the equipment used have a big influence on the measurement results. Especially, an angular field of view of single pixel of the digital sensor, which relates to a CCD or CMOS sensor size, dimensions of single photo-cell, focal length and technology that is used to make this device (B/W, color). A problem of the influence of depth of field of digital recording equipment with respect to the measured luminance values was dealt with. In this paper and presentation, the relationships of ILMD parameters, such as a field of view of a given type of sensor and single photo-element, including the used lens, will be presented.
测量与眩光计算有关的亮度分布时的典型误差原因
照明技术中常用的高亮度光源的数量正在系统地增长,导致潜在问题的数量增加。其中之一是不适眩光的问题和测量方法。与该参数相关的计算和测量方法都有一系列的缺点和优点。在严重的缺点中,光源和灯具的数字“模型”可能占主导地位,这些模型实际上不包括任何关于亮度分布的直接信息。为了使测量结果符合计算结果、计算机模拟和评估照明的人的视觉印象,测量装置应正确记录分析的参数。准确的参数记录意味着测量结果可能接近人眼记录的情况。现代测量系统,其中无疑有ilmd -成像亮度测量装置,可能是记录用于计算眩光的所有参数的理想选择。笔者的研究证明,特别是对于小光源,如led和多光源照明系统,所使用的设备参数对测量结果的影响很大。特别是数字传感器的单像素角视场,它涉及到CCD或CMOS传感器的尺寸、单个光电池的尺寸、焦距和用于制造该器件的技术(B/W,彩色)。研究了数字记录设备的景深对亮度测量值的影响问题。在本文和演讲中,将介绍ILMD参数之间的关系,例如给定类型传感器的视场和单个光元件,包括使用的镜头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信