Historical-Critical Analysis of the Bible and the Rise of Science of Religion

Arie L. Molendijk
{"title":"Historical-Critical Analysis of the Bible and the Rise of Science of Religion","authors":"Arie L. Molendijk","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192898029.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main intellectual developments discussed in this chapter are the rise of the historical-critical study of the Bible and the science of religion in the Netherlands in the second half of the nineteenth century. Both developments concern the historization of the field of theology itself, the use of historical and comparative methods to study religions. The influence of the natural sciences and Darwinism on theology was not particularly strong in the Netherlands. The first section addresses the ground-breaking work of the Old Testament scholar Abraham Kuenen, especially in relation to the publications of Julius Wellhausen and William Robertson Smith. The second section is devoted to the Dutch Radical School, which emerged at the end of the nineteenth century. The third section focuses on the new 1876 Higher Education Act, which introduced history of religions and philosophy of religion (often considered to be the two main branches of the ‘science of religion’) as part of the theological curriculum. The fourth section briefly introduces the work of two Dutch ‘pioneers’ of the science of religion and their views on theology in relation to it. Cornelis Petrus Tiele originally hoped for a complete transformation of theology into a science of religion that could fulfil the tasks of theology in a scholarly fashion, whereas Pierre Daniël Chantepie de la Saussaye aimed at a new phenomenology of religion that would remodel the study of religion, including Christianity.","PeriodicalId":324596,"journal":{"name":"Protestant Theology and Modernity in the Nineteenth-Century Netherlands","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protestant Theology and Modernity in the Nineteenth-Century Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898029.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main intellectual developments discussed in this chapter are the rise of the historical-critical study of the Bible and the science of religion in the Netherlands in the second half of the nineteenth century. Both developments concern the historization of the field of theology itself, the use of historical and comparative methods to study religions. The influence of the natural sciences and Darwinism on theology was not particularly strong in the Netherlands. The first section addresses the ground-breaking work of the Old Testament scholar Abraham Kuenen, especially in relation to the publications of Julius Wellhausen and William Robertson Smith. The second section is devoted to the Dutch Radical School, which emerged at the end of the nineteenth century. The third section focuses on the new 1876 Higher Education Act, which introduced history of religions and philosophy of religion (often considered to be the two main branches of the ‘science of religion’) as part of the theological curriculum. The fourth section briefly introduces the work of two Dutch ‘pioneers’ of the science of religion and their views on theology in relation to it. Cornelis Petrus Tiele originally hoped for a complete transformation of theology into a science of religion that could fulfil the tasks of theology in a scholarly fashion, whereas Pierre Daniël Chantepie de la Saussaye aimed at a new phenomenology of religion that would remodel the study of religion, including Christianity.
《圣经》的历史批判分析与宗教科学的兴起
本章讨论的主要智力发展是19世纪下半叶荷兰对圣经和宗教科学的历史批判研究的兴起。这两个发展都涉及神学领域本身的历史化,使用历史和比较的方法来研究宗教。自然科学和达尔文主义对神学的影响在荷兰并不是特别强烈。第一部分讲述了旧约学者亚伯拉罕·库南的开创性工作,特别是与朱利叶斯·威尔豪森和威廉·罗伯逊·史密斯的出版物有关。第二部分介绍19世纪末出现的荷兰激进派。第三部分的重点是1876年新的高等教育法,该法案将宗教史和宗教哲学(通常被认为是“宗教科学”的两个主要分支)作为神学课程的一部分。第四部分简要介绍了两位荷兰宗教科学“先驱”的工作,以及他们对神学的看法。Cornelis Petrus Tiele最初希望将神学完全转变为一门宗教科学,能够以学术的方式完成神学的任务,而Pierre Daniël Chantepie de la Saussaye的目标是一种新的宗教现象学,将重塑宗教研究,包括基督教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信