Pulling at the Digital Thread: Exploring the Tolerance Stack Up in Scan to Print Processes

Tobias Mahan, Brenna C. Doyle, N. Meisel, Jessica Menold
{"title":"Pulling at the Digital Thread: Exploring the Tolerance Stack Up in Scan to Print Processes","authors":"Tobias Mahan, Brenna C. Doyle, N. Meisel, Jessica Menold","doi":"10.1115/DETC2018-85844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of affordable rapid non-contact digitizers and rapid prototyping tools, such as 3D printers, is enabling the seamless integration of geometric reverse engineering into the early phases of engineering design. Scanning technology has been widely adopted in bio-reverse engineering and the use of high fidelity non-contact scanners, such as Computed Tomography devices, allows designers, doctors, and researchers to digitally model boney structures, design orthotic and prosthetic devices, and preemptively plan complex surgeries. While the combination of 3D scanning and printing processes holds much promise for the fields of reverse engineering, biodesign, and new product development, problems with repeatability, accuracy, and precision have limited the wider spread adoption of 3D scan to print processes. While some studies have explored the errors inherent in higher fidelity scan to print (S2P) processes, no studies have explored the errors in S2P processes that leverage affordable rapid non-contact digitizers. The purpose of this study was to explore at which phases of the S2P process errors are introduced into the digital model. A controlled study was conducted using data from 27 scans using a common off-the-shelf non-contact optical digitizer and a relatively simple workpiece. Data from the digital thread was collected between each phase of the S2P process and compared against a truth model; the geometric and dimensional integrity of the data was calculated through a comparison between the digital model and the original truth model. Results indicate significant differences between digital models at the various steps of the S2P process.","PeriodicalId":375011,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of affordable rapid non-contact digitizers and rapid prototyping tools, such as 3D printers, is enabling the seamless integration of geometric reverse engineering into the early phases of engineering design. Scanning technology has been widely adopted in bio-reverse engineering and the use of high fidelity non-contact scanners, such as Computed Tomography devices, allows designers, doctors, and researchers to digitally model boney structures, design orthotic and prosthetic devices, and preemptively plan complex surgeries. While the combination of 3D scanning and printing processes holds much promise for the fields of reverse engineering, biodesign, and new product development, problems with repeatability, accuracy, and precision have limited the wider spread adoption of 3D scan to print processes. While some studies have explored the errors inherent in higher fidelity scan to print (S2P) processes, no studies have explored the errors in S2P processes that leverage affordable rapid non-contact digitizers. The purpose of this study was to explore at which phases of the S2P process errors are introduced into the digital model. A controlled study was conducted using data from 27 scans using a common off-the-shelf non-contact optical digitizer and a relatively simple workpiece. Data from the digital thread was collected between each phase of the S2P process and compared against a truth model; the geometric and dimensional integrity of the data was calculated through a comparison between the digital model and the original truth model. Results indicate significant differences between digital models at the various steps of the S2P process.
拉动数字线:探索扫描到打印过程中的公差堆栈
经济实惠的快速非接触式数字化仪和快速原型工具(如3D打印机)的兴起,使几何逆向工程能够无缝集成到工程设计的早期阶段。扫描技术已广泛应用于生物逆向工程和使用高保真度非接触式扫描仪,如计算机断层扫描设备,允许设计师,医生和研究人员对骨骼结构进行数字建模,设计矫形器和假体装置,并预先计划复杂的手术。虽然3D扫描和打印工艺的结合在逆向工程、生物设计和新产品开发领域具有很大的前景,但可重复性、准确性和精度方面的问题限制了3D扫描在打印工艺中的广泛应用。虽然一些研究已经探索了高保真扫描打印(S2P)过程中固有的错误,但没有研究探索利用可负担得起的快速非接触式数字化设备的S2P过程中的错误。本研究的目的是探讨在哪个阶段的S2P过程误差被引入到数字模型。一项对照研究使用了27次扫描的数据,使用了一个常见的现成的非接触式光学数字化仪和一个相对简单的工件。在S2P过程的每个阶段之间收集来自数字线程的数据,并与真值模型进行比较;通过将数字模型与原始真值模型进行比较,计算数据的几何完整性和维度完整性。结果表明,在S2P过程的各个步骤中,数字模型之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信