Gerakan Lingkar Ganja Nusantara dalam Usaha Mengubah Kebijakan UU No 35 Tahun 2009 Terkait Narkotika Melalui Ruang Publik Masyarakat

Namus Akbar Nasution
{"title":"Gerakan Lingkar Ganja Nusantara dalam Usaha Mengubah Kebijakan UU No 35 Tahun 2009 Terkait Narkotika Melalui Ruang Publik Masyarakat","authors":"Namus Akbar Nasution","doi":"10.20473/jpi.v9i1.45142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research discusses the Ganja Nusantara Circle social movement in its efforts to legalize marijuana as a medical necessity. This movement was created because of the pros and cons associated with cannabis plants in Indonesia. This study uses the perspective of Jurgen Habermas, which centers on the problem of public sphere. In this case, the purpose of the research related to this movement is more focused on the use of public sphere as the main media in the movement of the LGN. In this paper it was found that cannabis plants also have various benefits, one of which is medical. UU No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics is still not fully relevant in relation to the placement of the cannabis group in narcotics group I. The law also still has several weaknesses, including too many rubber articles, multiple interpretations of articles that sometimes still confuse some parties. The focus in some of the problems related to cannabis plants is that Indonesia still does not have scientific research related to cannabis plants, so this still causes turmoil or differences in perspective for some people regarding marijuana. This research method uses qualitative analysis to explain and describe a phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":177356,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Politik indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Politik indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v9i1.45142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research discusses the Ganja Nusantara Circle social movement in its efforts to legalize marijuana as a medical necessity. This movement was created because of the pros and cons associated with cannabis plants in Indonesia. This study uses the perspective of Jurgen Habermas, which centers on the problem of public sphere. In this case, the purpose of the research related to this movement is more focused on the use of public sphere as the main media in the movement of the LGN. In this paper it was found that cannabis plants also have various benefits, one of which is medical. UU No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics is still not fully relevant in relation to the placement of the cannabis group in narcotics group I. The law also still has several weaknesses, including too many rubber articles, multiple interpretations of articles that sometimes still confuse some parties. The focus in some of the problems related to cannabis plants is that Indonesia still does not have scientific research related to cannabis plants, so this still causes turmoil or differences in perspective for some people regarding marijuana. This research method uses qualitative analysis to explain and describe a phenomenon.
全国大麻运动的Nusantara试图在2009年的公共广场上改变有关麻醉品的法律政策
本研究讨论了Ganja Nusantara圈社会运动在其努力合法化大麻作为医疗必需品。这一运动的产生是因为印度尼西亚大麻植物的利弊。本研究采用哈贝马斯的视角,以公共领域问题为中心。在这种情况下,与这一运动相关的研究目的更集中在公共领域作为主要媒体在LGN运动中的使用。在本文中,我们发现大麻植物也有各种各样的好处,其中之一是医疗。关于麻醉品的2009年第35号《国际麻醉品法》仍然与大麻类别在麻醉品类别i中的位置不完全相关。该法律还存在一些弱点,包括太多的橡胶条款,对条款的多种解释有时仍使一些当事方感到困惑。在一些与大麻植物有关的问题中,重点是印度尼西亚仍然没有与大麻植物相关的科学研究,所以这仍然会导致一些人对大麻的看法出现混乱或分歧。这种研究方法采用定性分析来解释和描述一种现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信