J.M.G. Le Clézio and Jacques Derrida’s “Limitrophic,” Biocentric Deconstruction of the “Genesis Myth”

Keith Moser
{"title":"J.M.G. Le Clézio and Jacques Derrida’s “Limitrophic,” Biocentric Deconstruction of the “Genesis Myth”","authors":"Keith Moser","doi":"10.7202/1101626ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This transdisciplinary reflection examines J.M.G. Le Clézio and Jacques Derrida’s limitrophic deconstruction of what is commonly referred to as the “genesis myth” in Judeo-Christian society. In addition to Cartesian dichotomies and debunked notions of human exceptionalism originating from Renaissance humanism, the Franco-Mauritian writer and Pied-noir philosopher take aim at the mainstream interpretation of Abrahamic cosmogonic narratives that have created a sharp ontological gap between Homo sapiens and other animals. Le Clézio and Derrida describe the genesis account of human-animal relations as an ecocidal, conflictual relationship that could be labeled a world war. They demonstrate that our dominant cognitive structures including the “genesis myth” that mostly remain uncontested, at least within the general public, have already left behind a path of irreversible destruction and other-than-human suffering. Unless we are able to curb the unending fury that the animal within us has unleashed against other sentient beings who bleed, suffer, live, and die just like us, Le Clézio and Derrida lament that our days are numbered.","PeriodicalId":200386,"journal":{"name":"L’espace à travers l’imaginaire littéraire","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L’espace à travers l’imaginaire littéraire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1101626ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This transdisciplinary reflection examines J.M.G. Le Clézio and Jacques Derrida’s limitrophic deconstruction of what is commonly referred to as the “genesis myth” in Judeo-Christian society. In addition to Cartesian dichotomies and debunked notions of human exceptionalism originating from Renaissance humanism, the Franco-Mauritian writer and Pied-noir philosopher take aim at the mainstream interpretation of Abrahamic cosmogonic narratives that have created a sharp ontological gap between Homo sapiens and other animals. Le Clézio and Derrida describe the genesis account of human-animal relations as an ecocidal, conflictual relationship that could be labeled a world war. They demonstrate that our dominant cognitive structures including the “genesis myth” that mostly remain uncontested, at least within the general public, have already left behind a path of irreversible destruction and other-than-human suffering. Unless we are able to curb the unending fury that the animal within us has unleashed against other sentient beings who bleed, suffer, live, and die just like us, Le Clézio and Derrida lament that our days are numbered.
j·m·g·勒·克拉西奥和雅克·德里达对“创世纪神话”的“有限的”、以生物为中心的解构
这种跨学科的反思考察了J.M.G. Le clacimzio和雅克·德里达对犹太教-基督教社会中通常被称为“创世纪神话”的有限解构。除了笛卡尔的二分法和源自文艺复兴人文主义的人类例外论,这位法国-毛里求斯作家和黑色派哲学家还将目标瞄准了对亚伯拉罕宇宙起源叙事的主流解释,这些叙事在人类和其他动物之间创造了一个尖锐的本体论鸿沟。Le clacimzio和德里达将人类与动物关系的起源描述为一种生态灭绝的、冲突的关系,可以贴上世界大战的标签。它们表明,我们的主流认知结构,包括“创世纪神话”,至少在普通公众中,基本上没有受到质疑,已经留下了一条不可逆转的毁灭和超越人类痛苦的道路。除非我们能够抑制我们内心的兽性对其他和我们一样流血、受苦、生活、死亡的有情众生释放出的无休止的愤怒,否则勒·克拉西奥和德里达哀叹我们的日子屈指可数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信