Towards Supporting Scientific Inquiry in Computer Science Education

S. Schulz, Niels Pinkwart
{"title":"Towards Supporting Scientific Inquiry in Computer Science Education","authors":"S. Schulz, Niels Pinkwart","doi":"10.1145/2978249.2978255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimentation is one of the key techniques to gain knowledge in science. Physical computing is increasingly gaining attention in computer science; it shares several features with experimentation so that it seems plausible to build on established models of experimentation for physical computing based computer science education. This paper presents a theoretically derived physical computing model and compares it to established models of scientific inquiry, pointing out common elements such as similar phases, but also potential differences. In a physical computing pilot study, we analyzed student behavior based on the theoretically derived model in order to see if this model -- when used to analyze student behavior -- is (1) reasonably applicable, and (2) potentially helpful for teachers. The results of the study generally confirm the appropriateness of the model as an analytical lens for describing student activities in physical computing exercises. At the same time, the study results also motivate slight modifications of the model. Finally, the study results may serve as a guide for teachers who want to conduct physical computing lessons.","PeriodicalId":423694,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2978249.2978255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Experimentation is one of the key techniques to gain knowledge in science. Physical computing is increasingly gaining attention in computer science; it shares several features with experimentation so that it seems plausible to build on established models of experimentation for physical computing based computer science education. This paper presents a theoretically derived physical computing model and compares it to established models of scientific inquiry, pointing out common elements such as similar phases, but also potential differences. In a physical computing pilot study, we analyzed student behavior based on the theoretically derived model in order to see if this model -- when used to analyze student behavior -- is (1) reasonably applicable, and (2) potentially helpful for teachers. The results of the study generally confirm the appropriateness of the model as an analytical lens for describing student activities in physical computing exercises. At the same time, the study results also motivate slight modifications of the model. Finally, the study results may serve as a guide for teachers who want to conduct physical computing lessons.
计算机科学教育中科学探究的支持
实验是获取科学知识的关键技术之一。物理计算在计算机科学中越来越受到关注;它与实验有几个共同的特点,因此建立在基于物理计算的计算机科学教育的实验模型上似乎是合理的。本文提出了一个理论推导的物理计算模型,并将其与已建立的科学探究模型进行了比较,指出了相似阶段等共同要素,但也指出了潜在的差异。在一项物理计算试点研究中,我们基于理论推导模型分析了学生行为,以了解该模型在用于分析学生行为时是否(1)合理适用,(2)对教师有潜在帮助。研究结果总体上证实了该模型作为描述学生在物理计算练习中的活动的分析镜头的适用性。同时,研究结果也激励了模型的轻微修改。最后,研究结果可以为想要进行物理计算课程的教师提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信