{"title":"IN SEARCH OF SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO’S POETRY","authors":"А. M. Kalynchuk","doi":"10.17721/2410-4094.2020.1(23).112-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article updates the works of O. Hrushevskyi and V. Shchepotiev, who replenished the tragic martyrologist of the national culture in the days of Stalin's genocide, as well as M. Markovskyi, who was forced to cease scientific activity. They laid the scientific foundations of Shevchenko studies together with I. Franko, M. Sumtsov, M. Zerov, P. Fylyppovych, M. Dray-Khmara, V. Miyakovskyi, B. Navrotskyi. The purpose of the article is to spread information about the contribution of O. Hrushevskyi, M. Markovskyi and V. Shchepotiev to the development of scientific approaches to the study of the poet's creativity, to update their texts, to correlate them with the problems of the development of Shevchenko's science in the first third of the 20th century. Shevchenko studies are considered in the context of developing by critics’ objective approaches to the study of the artist's heritage. Shevchenko's Intelligence of O. Hrushevskyi, M. Markovskyi and V. Shchepotiev in the early 20th сentury – interesting and relevant in the sense that they testified to the critics' attempts to interpret Shevchenko's achievements of a particular period from the perspective of the psychology of creativity, to consider in the context of the controversy about the historical-literary and folklore sources of his poetry. In their search for scientific research, scientists discussed the known facts, attracted unfamiliar materials, developed problems that were ripe for that period, thus supporting the development of Shevchenko studies in the first third of the 20th century, diversifying its directions. The results of this study can be used in the preparation of an objective monograph on the latest trends, problems, and prospects for the development of Shevchenko studies in the early 20th century.","PeriodicalId":262956,"journal":{"name":"Shevchenko Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shevchenko Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2410-4094.2020.1(23).112-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Article updates the works of O. Hrushevskyi and V. Shchepotiev, who replenished the tragic martyrologist of the national culture in the days of Stalin's genocide, as well as M. Markovskyi, who was forced to cease scientific activity. They laid the scientific foundations of Shevchenko studies together with I. Franko, M. Sumtsov, M. Zerov, P. Fylyppovych, M. Dray-Khmara, V. Miyakovskyi, B. Navrotskyi. The purpose of the article is to spread information about the contribution of O. Hrushevskyi, M. Markovskyi and V. Shchepotiev to the development of scientific approaches to the study of the poet's creativity, to update their texts, to correlate them with the problems of the development of Shevchenko's science in the first third of the 20th century. Shevchenko studies are considered in the context of developing by critics’ objective approaches to the study of the artist's heritage. Shevchenko's Intelligence of O. Hrushevskyi, M. Markovskyi and V. Shchepotiev in the early 20th сentury – interesting and relevant in the sense that they testified to the critics' attempts to interpret Shevchenko's achievements of a particular period from the perspective of the psychology of creativity, to consider in the context of the controversy about the historical-literary and folklore sources of his poetry. In their search for scientific research, scientists discussed the known facts, attracted unfamiliar materials, developed problems that were ripe for that period, thus supporting the development of Shevchenko studies in the first third of the 20th century, diversifying its directions. The results of this study can be used in the preparation of an objective monograph on the latest trends, problems, and prospects for the development of Shevchenko studies in the early 20th century.
文章更新了O.赫鲁晓夫斯基和V.谢切波蒂耶夫的作品,他们在斯大林的种族灭绝时期补充了民族文化的悲剧性殉道者,以及被迫停止科学活动的M.马尔科夫斯基。他们与I. Franko, M. Sumtsov, M. Zerov, P. Fylyppovych, M. Dray-Khmara, V. Miyakovskyi, B. Navrotskyi一起为舍甫琴科的研究奠定了科学基础。本文的目的是传播关于O.赫鲁舍夫斯基,M.马尔可夫斯基和V.谢切波蒂耶夫对诗人创造力研究的科学方法发展的贡献的信息,更新他们的文本,将他们与舍甫琴科在20世纪前三分之一的科学发展问题联系起来。舍甫琴科的研究被认为是在发展的背景下,由评论家的客观方法来研究艺术家的遗产。舍甫琴科的智力的O.赫鲁舍夫斯基,M.马尔可夫斯基和V.谢切波蒂耶夫在20世纪初-有趣和相关的意义上,他们证明了评论家试图解释舍甫琴科的成就在一个特定的时期从创造心理学的角度,考虑在争议的背景下,历史文学和民间传说来源的诗歌。在寻找科学研究的过程中,科学家们讨论了已知的事实,吸收了不熟悉的材料,提出了当时已经成熟的问题,从而支持了舍甫琴科研究在20世纪前三分之一时期的发展,使其方向多样化。这项研究的结果可用于编写关于20世纪初舍甫琴科研究发展的最新趋势、问题和前景的客观专著。