Advanced cooling techniques comparison for airborne electronic circuits

Y. Assouad, M. Caplot, T. Gautier
{"title":"Advanced cooling techniques comparison for airborne electronic circuits","authors":"Y. Assouad, M. Caplot, T. Gautier","doi":"10.1109/STHERM.1997.566790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison of the performances of four different cooling techniques of modular avionics modules (233/spl times/150 mm) has been conducted. The cooling methods which have been investigated are conduction through a metallic (aluminum) core embedded in the module and Air Flow Through (AFT) module on one part, using theoretical evaluations, Liquid Flow Through (LFT) module and heat pipe using test results on the other part. The comparison yields the following conclusions. Conduction and AFT modules are limited to a maximum power dissipation in the range of 50 W. Heat pipes allow power dissipations in the range of 150 to 200 W but depending on the technology, their performances can be greatly decreased by gravity, vibrations and acceleration effects; moreover, the market for flat heat pipes of the kind necessary for modular avionics modules is not strong enough yet to support a substantial industrial production. LFT is the best cooling technique since it can allow power dissipations of more than 600 W, which covers more than foreseen needs for modular avionics modules.","PeriodicalId":126120,"journal":{"name":"Thirteenth Annual IEEE. Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thirteenth Annual IEEE. Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STHERM.1997.566790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A comparison of the performances of four different cooling techniques of modular avionics modules (233/spl times/150 mm) has been conducted. The cooling methods which have been investigated are conduction through a metallic (aluminum) core embedded in the module and Air Flow Through (AFT) module on one part, using theoretical evaluations, Liquid Flow Through (LFT) module and heat pipe using test results on the other part. The comparison yields the following conclusions. Conduction and AFT modules are limited to a maximum power dissipation in the range of 50 W. Heat pipes allow power dissipations in the range of 150 to 200 W but depending on the technology, their performances can be greatly decreased by gravity, vibrations and acceleration effects; moreover, the market for flat heat pipes of the kind necessary for modular avionics modules is not strong enough yet to support a substantial industrial production. LFT is the best cooling technique since it can allow power dissipations of more than 600 W, which covers more than foreseen needs for modular avionics modules.
机载电子电路先进冷却技术比较
对模块化航电模块(233/spl次/150 mm)的4种不同冷却方式的性能进行了比较。所研究的冷却方法是通过嵌入在模块中的金属(铝)芯和空气流过(AFT)模块进行传导,采用理论评估,另一部分采用液体流过(LFT)模块和热管进行测试。通过比较可以得出以下结论。传导和AFT模块的最大功耗限制在50w范围内。热管的功率耗散范围为150至200瓦,但根据技术的不同,它们的性能可能会因重力、振动和加速度效应而大大降低;此外,模块化航空电子模块所需的那种平板热管的市场还不够强大,不足以支持大规模的工业生产。LFT是最好的冷却技术,因为它可以允许超过600 W的功耗,这超过了模块化航空电子模块的预期需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书