The Acceptability of Moist Noodle with Subtitute Flour Mackerel Fish (Rastrelliger SP)

Ayu Bulan Febry Kurnia, L. Ntau, Deny Indra Setiawan, N. Nuryani
{"title":"The Acceptability of Moist Noodle with Subtitute Flour Mackerel Fish (Rastrelliger SP)","authors":"Ayu Bulan Febry Kurnia, L. Ntau, Deny Indra Setiawan, N. Nuryani","doi":"10.36590/jika.v4i2.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fishery products are abundant in Gorontalo Province, so it is necessary to strive for processing to increase the nutritional value and economic value in the manufacture of noodle products. This study aims to determine the acceptability of wet noodle products that have been substituted with mackerel flour (Rastrelliger sp.). The research method used is pure experiment, the samples used are 3 samples, namely F0 wet noodles without the addition of fish meal, F1 wet noodles with 20 grams of mackerel flour using the pressing method, F2 wet noodles with the addition of 20 grams of mackerel flour without pressing. . Acceptability is measured by the level of preference including color, smell, taste and texture with a hedonic scale. Acceptance test was conducted on 25 well-trained panelists. Data analysis with ANOVA (analysis of variance) diversity test and Wicolxon difference test. The results showed that the organoptic diversity test of wet noodles on the color variable showed that there was no difference in color preference between the three wet noodles. While the variables of aroma, taste, and texture of wet noodles showed differences in the level of preference. The results of the different aroma test are known to have p-value <0.05 for F1 with F0 and F2 with F1. Meanwhile, the panelists' level of preference for the aroma of wet noodles F2 is the same as F0. The results of the taste difference test showed that the p-value <0.05 for F1 with F0 and F2 with F0, while the panelists' preference for the aroma of wet noodles F2 was the same as F1. Texture variable, shows p-value < 0.05 for F1 with F0 less than 0.05. It can be concluded that there is a difference in the preferences of the panelists between the aroma of wet noodles F1 and the aroma of wet noodles F0, the aroma of wet noodles F1 and the aroma of wet noodles F0, there is a difference in the preference of the panelists between the texture of wet noodles F1 and the texture of wet noodles F0, there is no difference in the level of preference of the panelists. on the texture of wet noodles F2 with F0 and F2 with F1.","PeriodicalId":408003,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (JIKA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (JIKA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36590/jika.v4i2.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fishery products are abundant in Gorontalo Province, so it is necessary to strive for processing to increase the nutritional value and economic value in the manufacture of noodle products. This study aims to determine the acceptability of wet noodle products that have been substituted with mackerel flour (Rastrelliger sp.). The research method used is pure experiment, the samples used are 3 samples, namely F0 wet noodles without the addition of fish meal, F1 wet noodles with 20 grams of mackerel flour using the pressing method, F2 wet noodles with the addition of 20 grams of mackerel flour without pressing. . Acceptability is measured by the level of preference including color, smell, taste and texture with a hedonic scale. Acceptance test was conducted on 25 well-trained panelists. Data analysis with ANOVA (analysis of variance) diversity test and Wicolxon difference test. The results showed that the organoptic diversity test of wet noodles on the color variable showed that there was no difference in color preference between the three wet noodles. While the variables of aroma, taste, and texture of wet noodles showed differences in the level of preference. The results of the different aroma test are known to have p-value <0.05 for F1 with F0 and F2 with F1. Meanwhile, the panelists' level of preference for the aroma of wet noodles F2 is the same as F0. The results of the taste difference test showed that the p-value <0.05 for F1 with F0 and F2 with F0, while the panelists' preference for the aroma of wet noodles F2 was the same as F1. Texture variable, shows p-value < 0.05 for F1 with F0 less than 0.05. It can be concluded that there is a difference in the preferences of the panelists between the aroma of wet noodles F1 and the aroma of wet noodles F0, the aroma of wet noodles F1 and the aroma of wet noodles F0, there is a difference in the preference of the panelists between the texture of wet noodles F1 and the texture of wet noodles F0, there is no difference in the level of preference of the panelists. on the texture of wet noodles F2 with F0 and F2 with F1.
马鲛鱼代粉湿面的可接受性
哥伦塔洛省渔业产品丰富,在面制品生产中要努力加工,提高其营养价值和经济价值。本研究旨在确定湿面产品的可接受性,已取代鲭鱼粉(Rastrelliger sp.)。采用的研究方法为纯实验,使用的样品为3个样品,即F0湿面不添加鱼粉,F1湿面采用压榨法添加鲭鱼粉20克,F2湿面添加鲭鱼粉20克不压榨。可接受性是通过对颜色、气味、味道和质地的偏好程度来衡量的。验收测试在25名训练有素的小组成员中进行。数据分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)多样性检验和Wicolxon差异检验。结果表明,湿面在颜色变量上的有机光学多样性测试表明,三种湿面对颜色的偏好没有差异。而湿面的香气、口感、质地等变量则表现出偏好程度的差异。已知F1与F0、F2与F1的不同香气测试结果p值均<0.05。同时,小组成员对湿面香气的偏好程度F2与F0相同。味觉差异检验结果显示,F1与F0、F2与F0的p值均<0.05,而小组成员对湿面香气的偏好F2与F1相同。纹理变量,F1的p值< 0.05,F0 < 0.05。可以得出,小组成员对湿面香气F1和湿面香气F0、湿面香气F1和湿面香气F0的偏好存在差异,小组成员对湿面质地F1和湿面质地F0的偏好存在差异,小组成员的偏好水平没有差异。F2与F0、F2与F1对湿面质地的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信