THE CRUCIFIED GOD AT THE BASIS OF MODERN EUROPEAN SCIENCE AND SOURCES OF THE INTERNALIST ANTIPOSITIVISM. ARTICLE TWO: KOJÈVE

I. Kurilovich
{"title":"THE CRUCIFIED GOD AT THE BASIS OF MODERN EUROPEAN SCIENCE AND SOURCES OF THE INTERNALIST ANTIPOSITIVISM. ARTICLE TWO: KOJÈVE","authors":"I. Kurilovich","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2020-4-41-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Religion-Science relationship is often understood as problematic, and they themselves as sides in the confrontation between clericalism and scientism. Against the background of those polemic party positions stands out the study of the positive significance of theological toposes and mythology in science when it is secular and atheistic. One of the vivid examples of that one meets in the reflections of two French philosophers of Russian origin, Alexandre Koyré and Alexandre Kojève. By studying the genesis of science, Koyré discovers that modern mathematical physics requires a homogeneous world, and it became so for the first time in Christian Europe in the 16th–17th centuries. Kojève continues Koyré’s reflections – according to him, the application of the celestial science of mathematics to terrestrial physics became possible through the habit of European thinkers to the scandalous thought about the Incarnation of God, about the possibility for the infinity and for the perfection to be born in the flesh and thus “heal” it. The positions of both have their origin in Hegel’s thoughts, but in some points do not agree with him. The research consists of three parts published in three separate articles: on the foundation of Modern science at Koyré, Kojève and Hegel. The second part is about Alexandre Kojève.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2020-4-41-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Religion-Science relationship is often understood as problematic, and they themselves as sides in the confrontation between clericalism and scientism. Against the background of those polemic party positions stands out the study of the positive significance of theological toposes and mythology in science when it is secular and atheistic. One of the vivid examples of that one meets in the reflections of two French philosophers of Russian origin, Alexandre Koyré and Alexandre Kojève. By studying the genesis of science, Koyré discovers that modern mathematical physics requires a homogeneous world, and it became so for the first time in Christian Europe in the 16th–17th centuries. Kojève continues Koyré’s reflections – according to him, the application of the celestial science of mathematics to terrestrial physics became possible through the habit of European thinkers to the scandalous thought about the Incarnation of God, about the possibility for the infinity and for the perfection to be born in the flesh and thus “heal” it. The positions of both have their origin in Hegel’s thoughts, but in some points do not agree with him. The research consists of three parts published in three separate articles: on the foundation of Modern science at Koyré, Kojève and Hegel. The second part is about Alexandre Kojève.
被钉在十字架上的神是现代欧洲科学的基础和内部主义反实证主义的来源。第二条:kojÈve
宗教与科学的关系常常被认为是有问题的,它们本身就是教权主义与科学主义对抗的双方。在这些争论的党派立场的背景下,神学主题和神话在世俗和无神论的科学中的积极意义的研究脱颖而出。其中一个生动的例子就是两位俄国血统的法国哲学家,亚历山大·科伊罗伊和亚历山大·科伊焦里夫的思考。通过研究科学的起源,koyr发现现代数学物理学需要一个同质的世界,而在16 - 17世纪的基督教欧洲,这是第一次实现。koj继续了koyr的思考——在他看来,将天体科学的数学应用于地球物理学,是通过欧洲思想家对上帝道成肉身的可耻思想的习惯而成为可能的,关于无限的可能性,以及在肉体中诞生的完美,从而“治愈”它。这两种观点都起源于黑格尔的思想,但在某些方面与黑格尔的观点不一致。该研究由三部分组成,分别发表在三篇独立的文章中:关于koyr、koj和黑格尔的现代科学基础。第二部分是关于Alexandre koj的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信