{"title":"Positionally-sensitive action-ascription","authors":"Arnulf Deppermann, Alexandra Gubina","doi":"10.1075/il.21005.dep","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Schegloff (1996) has argued that grammars are\n “positionally-sensitive”, implying that the situated use and understanding of linguistic formats depends on their\n sequential position. Analyzing the German format Kannst du X? (corresponding to English Can you\n X?) based on 82 instances from a large corpus of talk-in-interaction (FOLK), this paper shows how\n different action-ascriptions to turns using the same format depend on various orders of context. We show that not only\n sequential position, but also epistemic status, interactional histories, multimodal conduct, and linguistic devices\n co-occurring in the same turn are decisive for the action implemented by the format. The range of actions performed with\n Kannst du X? and their close interpretive interrelationship suggest that they should not be\n viewed as a fixed inventory of context-dependent interpretations of the format. Rather, the format provides for a\n root-interpretation that can be adapted to local contextual contingencies, yielding situated action-ascriptions that\n depend on constraints created by contexts of use.","PeriodicalId":210541,"journal":{"name":"Interactional Linguistics","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactional Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21005.dep","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Schegloff (1996) has argued that grammars are
“positionally-sensitive”, implying that the situated use and understanding of linguistic formats depends on their
sequential position. Analyzing the German format Kannst du X? (corresponding to English Can you
X?) based on 82 instances from a large corpus of talk-in-interaction (FOLK), this paper shows how
different action-ascriptions to turns using the same format depend on various orders of context. We show that not only
sequential position, but also epistemic status, interactional histories, multimodal conduct, and linguistic devices
co-occurring in the same turn are decisive for the action implemented by the format. The range of actions performed with
Kannst du X? and their close interpretive interrelationship suggest that they should not be
viewed as a fixed inventory of context-dependent interpretations of the format. Rather, the format provides for a
root-interpretation that can be adapted to local contextual contingencies, yielding situated action-ascriptions that
depend on constraints created by contexts of use.
Schegloff(1996)认为语法是“位置敏感的”,这意味着语言格式的位置使用和理解取决于它们的顺序位置。德语格式Kannst du X?(对应于英语Can you X?)基于一个大型对话-互动语料库(FOLK)中的82个实例,本文展示了使用相同格式的回合的不同动作归属如何取决于不同的上下文顺序。我们表明,不仅顺序位置,而且在同一回合中共同出现的认知状态、相互作用历史、多模态行为和语言装置对格式实现的动作起决定性作用。Kannst du X?它们之间密切的解释关系表明,它们不应被视为对格式的依赖于上下文的解释的固定清单。相反,该格式提供了一种可以适应当地上下文偶然性的根解释,产生依赖于使用上下文所产生的约束的情境动作归因。