Legal Instruments for Determining Personal Insurance Measures in the "Republic of Albania"

Elton Musa, S. Musa
{"title":"Legal Instruments for Determining Personal Insurance Measures in the \"Republic of Albania\"","authors":"Elton Musa, S. Musa","doi":"10.56345/ijrdv10n1s111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any restriction of freedom must be objectively justified and for a duration no longer than is necessary. In exceptional cases, when the limitation of freedom is considered necessary, it must guarantee the respect of rights and guarantees of a procedural nature, provided for in international acts that are mandatory to be implemented in domestic legislation. The right to liberty means only protection from restriction of physical liberty. It is not easy to define the meaning of the term \"restriction of freedom\", but in general we will understand this as the obligation to stay in a limited space for a considerable period of time. In every country in the world, people are arrested and detained on suspicion of having committed a criminal offence. Often, these individuals are kept restricted from their freedom for weeks, months or even years before a competent court pronounces a decision on their case on the merits. The conditions in which these individuals are kept are often the worst in the internal penitentiary system. Their legal status is in jeopardy as they are suspects but have not pleaded guilty and they are under enormous pressure, due to the damage they suffer in economic terms or separation from family and community. The extended use of arrest in prison or at home, in the Republic of Albania, evidences a poor recognition of the conditions and criteria for assigning coercive personal security measures, by the actors of the criminal justice system, in particular by the prosecution and the court. However, the role of the courts remains fundamental not only for the correction of procedural actions carried out by the prosecution and the police, but especially for the guarantee of freedoms and fundamental rights, as well as the principles of the rule of law. \n  \nReceived: 05 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published: 20 May 2023","PeriodicalId":136623,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv10n1s111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Any restriction of freedom must be objectively justified and for a duration no longer than is necessary. In exceptional cases, when the limitation of freedom is considered necessary, it must guarantee the respect of rights and guarantees of a procedural nature, provided for in international acts that are mandatory to be implemented in domestic legislation. The right to liberty means only protection from restriction of physical liberty. It is not easy to define the meaning of the term "restriction of freedom", but in general we will understand this as the obligation to stay in a limited space for a considerable period of time. In every country in the world, people are arrested and detained on suspicion of having committed a criminal offence. Often, these individuals are kept restricted from their freedom for weeks, months or even years before a competent court pronounces a decision on their case on the merits. The conditions in which these individuals are kept are often the worst in the internal penitentiary system. Their legal status is in jeopardy as they are suspects but have not pleaded guilty and they are under enormous pressure, due to the damage they suffer in economic terms or separation from family and community. The extended use of arrest in prison or at home, in the Republic of Albania, evidences a poor recognition of the conditions and criteria for assigning coercive personal security measures, by the actors of the criminal justice system, in particular by the prosecution and the court. However, the role of the courts remains fundamental not only for the correction of procedural actions carried out by the prosecution and the police, but especially for the guarantee of freedoms and fundamental rights, as well as the principles of the rule of law.   Received: 05 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published: 20 May 2023
确定“阿尔巴尼亚共和国”人身保险措施的法律文书
对自由的任何限制都必须有客观的理由,限制的时间不得超过必要的时间。在例外情况下,当认为有必要限制自由时,它必须保证尊重权利和程序性的保障,这是国际法律所规定的,必须在国内立法中执行。自由权仅仅意味着保护人身自由不受限制。定义“限制自由”一词的含义并不容易,但一般来说,我们将其理解为在相当长的一段时间内留在有限空间的义务。在世界上的每一个国家,人们都因涉嫌犯罪而被逮捕和拘留。这些人的自由往往被限制几个星期、几个月甚至几年,直到主管法院根据案情对他们的案件作出裁决。这些人被关押的条件往往是内部监狱系统中最恶劣的。他们的法律地位处于危险之中,因为他们是嫌疑犯,但没有认罪,由于他们在经济方面遭受损失或与家庭和社区分离,他们承受着巨大的压力。在阿尔巴尼亚共和国,在监狱或家中广泛使用逮捕,证明刑事司法系统的行为者,特别是检察机关和法院,对采取强制性人身安全措施的条件和标准认识不足。但是,法院的作用不仅在纠正检察机关和警察的程序性行动方面,而且特别是在保障自由和基本权利以及法治原则方面,仍然是至关重要的。收稿日期:2022年5月05日/收稿日期:2023年5月16日/发表日期:2023年5月20日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信