Early-Age Strength and Workability of Basalt Fiber ReinforcedConcrete Made with Recycled Aggregates – A Pilot Study

S. Shoaib, Hilal El-Hassan, Bilal El-Aris, T. E. Maaddawy
{"title":"Early-Age Strength and Workability of Basalt Fiber ReinforcedConcrete Made with Recycled Aggregates – A Pilot Study","authors":"S. Shoaib, Hilal El-Hassan, Bilal El-Aris, T. E. Maaddawy","doi":"10.11159/iccste20.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents the combined effect of replacing natural aggregates by recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) and incorporating basalt fibers on the workability, 7-day compressive strength, and 7-day splitting tensile strength of concrete mixes. Three target design compressive strengths were used (30, 45, and 60 MPa). Untreated RCA were used in addition to two types of basalt fibers at volume fractions ranging from 0 to 3%. The basalt fiber types used in this work had lengths of 20 and 43 mm. Locally available desert dune sand was utilized in concrete mixes as a sustainable replacement to conventional crushed fine aggregates. The experimental results showed that the incorporation of basalt fibers resulted in a significant decrease in the workability of fresh concrete. The retention of 7day compressive strength in basalt fiber-reinforced RCA concrete was superior when the design strength was 30 MPa rather than 45 and 60 MPa. The 7-day splitting tensile strength of RCA-based concrete was effectively restored upon the addition of basalt fibers. It exceeded that of the control mixes with higher basalt fiber volume fractions and 43 mm-long basalt fibers.","PeriodicalId":307663,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering (ICCSTE'19)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering (ICCSTE'19)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/iccste20.226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents the combined effect of replacing natural aggregates by recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) and incorporating basalt fibers on the workability, 7-day compressive strength, and 7-day splitting tensile strength of concrete mixes. Three target design compressive strengths were used (30, 45, and 60 MPa). Untreated RCA were used in addition to two types of basalt fibers at volume fractions ranging from 0 to 3%. The basalt fiber types used in this work had lengths of 20 and 43 mm. Locally available desert dune sand was utilized in concrete mixes as a sustainable replacement to conventional crushed fine aggregates. The experimental results showed that the incorporation of basalt fibers resulted in a significant decrease in the workability of fresh concrete. The retention of 7day compressive strength in basalt fiber-reinforced RCA concrete was superior when the design strength was 30 MPa rather than 45 and 60 MPa. The 7-day splitting tensile strength of RCA-based concrete was effectively restored upon the addition of basalt fibers. It exceeded that of the control mixes with higher basalt fiber volume fractions and 43 mm-long basalt fibers.
再生骨料制备玄武岩纤维增强混凝土的早期强度和和易性试验研究
本文研究了再生混凝土骨料(RCA)替代天然骨料和掺入玄武岩纤维对混凝土配合比和易性、7天抗压强度和7天劈裂抗拉强度的综合影响。使用了三种目标设计抗压强度(30、45和60 MPa)。在两种玄武岩纤维的体积分数范围为0 ~ 3%的情况下,使用未经处理的RCA。在这项工作中使用的玄武岩纤维类型长度为20和43毫米。当地可用的沙漠沙丘砂被用于混凝土混合物中,作为传统破碎细骨料的可持续替代品。试验结果表明,玄武岩纤维的掺入使新拌混凝土的和易性显著降低。当设计强度为30 MPa时,玄武岩纤维增强RCA混凝土的7天抗压强度保持性优于45 MPa和60 MPa。添加玄武岩纤维后,rca基混凝土的7天劈裂抗拉强度得到有效恢复。它超过了具有较高玄武岩纤维体积分数和43 mm长玄武岩纤维的对照混合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信