A Review on Anticipatory Contractual Breaches and Remedies under CISG

Sun-ok Kim
{"title":"A Review on Anticipatory Contractual Breaches and Remedies under CISG","authors":"Sun-ok Kim","doi":"10.16980/jitc.19.2.202304.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This research aims to explore the practical application of anticipatory breaches in international sale contracts, examine the legal framework, and analyze the impact on the parties involved. Design/Methodology/Approach – The research methodology involves analyzing a case study in which decisions were made applying articles 71, 72, and 73 of the CISG, which govern the issue of an anticipatory breach of contract. Findings – The findings suggest that a party intending to suspend its obligations or terminate a contract for an anticipatory breach must present objective evidence. However, if there are suspicions, but it is difficult to submit evidence, the party may, by notice, request the other party provide appropriate security for the performance of the contract. If the other party does not provide adequate security, that fact could be used as evidence. Research Implications – The anticipatory breach provisions set out in articles 71, 72, and 73 of the CISG help to adjust potential damages and allow both parties to take effective measures in case of a potential breach of contract. It may be necessary for both sellers and buyers to take effective measures without waiting until the breach materializes on the due date. The originality of the research lies in its examination of the practical application and legal framework of anticipatory breach, and its impact on the parties involved in international sale contracts.","PeriodicalId":166989,"journal":{"name":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.2.202304.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – This research aims to explore the practical application of anticipatory breaches in international sale contracts, examine the legal framework, and analyze the impact on the parties involved. Design/Methodology/Approach – The research methodology involves analyzing a case study in which decisions were made applying articles 71, 72, and 73 of the CISG, which govern the issue of an anticipatory breach of contract. Findings – The findings suggest that a party intending to suspend its obligations or terminate a contract for an anticipatory breach must present objective evidence. However, if there are suspicions, but it is difficult to submit evidence, the party may, by notice, request the other party provide appropriate security for the performance of the contract. If the other party does not provide adequate security, that fact could be used as evidence. Research Implications – The anticipatory breach provisions set out in articles 71, 72, and 73 of the CISG help to adjust potential damages and allow both parties to take effective measures in case of a potential breach of contract. It may be necessary for both sellers and buyers to take effective measures without waiting until the breach materializes on the due date. The originality of the research lies in its examination of the practical application and legal framework of anticipatory breach, and its impact on the parties involved in international sale contracts.
《销售公约》规定的预期合同违约及救济审查
目的-本研究旨在探讨预期违约在国际销售合同中的实际应用,审查法律框架,并分析对当事人的影响。设计/方法/方法-研究方法涉及分析一个案例研究,在该案例研究中作出的决定适用《销售公约》第71、72和73条,这些条款规定了预期违约问题。调查结果-调查结果表明,打算因预期违约而中止其义务或终止合同的一方必须提出客观证据。但是,当事人有怀疑而又难以提出证据的,可以通知对方为履行合同提供适当担保。如果另一方没有提供充分的担保,该事实可以作为证据。研究意义-《销售公约》第71条、第72条和第73条规定的预期违约条款有助于调整潜在的损害赔偿,并允许双方在潜在违约情况下采取有效措施。卖方和买方可能都有必要采取有效措施,而不是等到违约发生在到期日期。本研究的独创性在于考察了预期违约的实际适用、法律框架及其对国际买卖合同当事人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信