A Comparative Study between Transrectal Ultrasound Guided 6-Core and 12-Core Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Prostate Cancer

Dr. Md. Asaduzzaman, Dr. Md. Mostakim Maoya, Dr. Md. Shaheen Reza, Dr. Munshi Akid Mostofa, Dr. Md. Masud Rana, Dr. Md. Tanuwar Islam Chowdhury
{"title":"A Comparative Study between Transrectal Ultrasound Guided 6-Core and 12-Core Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Prostate Cancer","authors":"Dr. Md. Asaduzzaman, Dr. Md. Mostakim Maoya, Dr. Md. Shaheen Reza, Dr. Munshi Akid Mostofa, Dr. Md. Masud Rana, Dr. Md. Tanuwar Islam Chowdhury","doi":"10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prostate cancer is common in urological practice. Diagnosis of prostate cancer depends on biopsy of the prostate. For the last two decade TRUS guided 6 core (sextant) biopsy is being considered as standard for prostate biopsy. Various studies in different countries showed the drawback of sextant biopsy. The debate remains alive on number of biopsy core which is appropriate for obtaining representative tissue. Moreover, more number of needle biopsy may be associated with more complication. Methods: In this hospital based Quasi experimental study, a total of 50 patients were allocated into two groups by purposive sampling technique where 6 core prostate biopsy in one group and 12 core biopsy in another group. Baseline demographic and clinical data were recorded. Post procedural morbidity & histopathological findings were recorded. All the collected data were compiled. Further Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by using Microsoft Xcel, 2010 and web based computer software - Graph Pad Software, 2017. A probability value (p) of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The baseline characteristics like age, S.PSA, prostate volume & DRE findings were similar in two groups. Cancer detection rate was not significantly different between the 6 core biopsy group and 12 core biopsy group (48% Vs 60%, p=0.395). Dysuria with difficulty in micturition and hematuria after biopsy significantly more in 12 core biopsy group (24% Vs 44% and 32% Vs 60% respectively). Other post procedural complications like fever, perrectal bleeding was found statistically not significant between two groups Conclusion: Trans rectal ultrasound guided 6 core biopsy is equally effective as Trans rectal ultrasound guided 12 core biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":397187,"journal":{"name":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/gajms.2022.v04i06.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is common in urological practice. Diagnosis of prostate cancer depends on biopsy of the prostate. For the last two decade TRUS guided 6 core (sextant) biopsy is being considered as standard for prostate biopsy. Various studies in different countries showed the drawback of sextant biopsy. The debate remains alive on number of biopsy core which is appropriate for obtaining representative tissue. Moreover, more number of needle biopsy may be associated with more complication. Methods: In this hospital based Quasi experimental study, a total of 50 patients were allocated into two groups by purposive sampling technique where 6 core prostate biopsy in one group and 12 core biopsy in another group. Baseline demographic and clinical data were recorded. Post procedural morbidity & histopathological findings were recorded. All the collected data were compiled. Further Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by using Microsoft Xcel, 2010 and web based computer software - Graph Pad Software, 2017. A probability value (p) of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The baseline characteristics like age, S.PSA, prostate volume & DRE findings were similar in two groups. Cancer detection rate was not significantly different between the 6 core biopsy group and 12 core biopsy group (48% Vs 60%, p=0.395). Dysuria with difficulty in micturition and hematuria after biopsy significantly more in 12 core biopsy group (24% Vs 44% and 32% Vs 60% respectively). Other post procedural complications like fever, perrectal bleeding was found statistically not significant between two groups Conclusion: Trans rectal ultrasound guided 6 core biopsy is equally effective as Trans rectal ultrasound guided 12 core biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
经直肠超声引导下6芯与12芯前列腺活检检测前列腺癌的比较研究
背景:前列腺癌是泌尿外科的常见病。前列腺癌的诊断依赖于前列腺活检。在过去的二十年中,TRUS引导的6芯(六分仪)活检被认为是前列腺活检的标准。不同国家的各种研究显示了六分仪活检的缺点。关于适合获得代表性组织的活检芯数量的争论仍然存在。此外,针头活检次数越多,并发症也越多。方法:采用医院为基础的准实验研究方法,将50例患者分为两组,一组6例核心前列腺活检,另一组12例核心前列腺活检。记录基线人口统计学和临床数据。记录术后发病率和组织病理学结果。所有收集到的数据都进行了整理。采用Microsoft Xcel, 2010和基于web的计算机软件- Graph Pad software, 2017对结果进行进一步的统计分析。概率值(p)小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:两组患者年龄、psa、前列腺体积、DRE等基线特征相似。6芯活检组与12芯活检组的肿瘤检出率差异无统计学意义(48% Vs 60%, p=0.395)。12芯活检组尿痛、排尿困难和血尿明显增多(分别为24% Vs 44%和32% Vs 60%)。其他术后并发症如发热、经直肠出血两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:经直肠超声引导下6芯活检与经直肠超声引导下12芯活检对前列腺癌的检测效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信