Does Self-measurement of Blood Pressure (SMBP) Contribute to Improve the Degree of Hypertension Control?

Angel Rodríguez, Ana Beatriz de Abajo Larriba, E. Rodríguez, B. Cobo, O. M. Atoui, R. López, S. A. Olea, J. Álvarez, M. J. López
{"title":"Does Self-measurement of Blood Pressure (SMBP) Contribute to Improve the Degree of Hypertension Control?","authors":"Angel Rodríguez, Ana Beatriz de Abajo Larriba, E. Rodríguez, B. Cobo, O. M. Atoui, R. López, S. A. Olea, J. Álvarez, M. J. López","doi":"10.4172/2327-4972.1000I183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Self-measurement of blood pressure can be associated with a better control of blood pressure. The objectives of this study were to determine the degree of control with two measuring methods (clinical blood pressure measure and self-measurement of blood pressure) and determine the factors associated with poor control. Methods: Multicenter randomized cross-sectional Study in Hypertensive patients diagnosed and treated at Primary Care. Recollected data included: socio-demographic profiles, personal history, standard blood tests and arterial pressure measure by self-measurement of blood pressure and clinical blood pressure measure. Control objectives included for self-measurement of blood pressure (<135/85 mmHg) and for clinical blood pressure measure (<140/90 mmHg). Data are expressed in percentages and averages with a CI of 95%. Results: 514 patients where included (59.3% female) with a mean age of 70.84 (80.01-61.67) years old and 10.37 (14.87-5.62) years of hypertensive disease evolution. The degree of control was 84.67% (83.58-85.76) with self-measurement of blood pressure and 68.54% (67.31-69.77); p<0.0001. Patients controlled by self-measurement of blood pressure took 2.58 (1.65-3.51) versus 2.97 (2.11-3.83) with clinical blood pressure measure; p<0.001. Being more frequent the use of fixed combinations. Obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, severity of hypertension, measurement method, number of drugs and age were associated with poorer control of the blood pressure; p<0.001. Conclusions: The degree of control with self-measurement of blood pressure is very high, compared with ambulatory monitoring, with important clinical significance. Although the characteristics of this study can not infer causality, this finding reinforces the recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the regularly use of the self-measurement of blood pressure in our daily practice.","PeriodicalId":356612,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Medical Science Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Medical Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4972.1000I183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background and objectives: Self-measurement of blood pressure can be associated with a better control of blood pressure. The objectives of this study were to determine the degree of control with two measuring methods (clinical blood pressure measure and self-measurement of blood pressure) and determine the factors associated with poor control. Methods: Multicenter randomized cross-sectional Study in Hypertensive patients diagnosed and treated at Primary Care. Recollected data included: socio-demographic profiles, personal history, standard blood tests and arterial pressure measure by self-measurement of blood pressure and clinical blood pressure measure. Control objectives included for self-measurement of blood pressure (<135/85 mmHg) and for clinical blood pressure measure (<140/90 mmHg). Data are expressed in percentages and averages with a CI of 95%. Results: 514 patients where included (59.3% female) with a mean age of 70.84 (80.01-61.67) years old and 10.37 (14.87-5.62) years of hypertensive disease evolution. The degree of control was 84.67% (83.58-85.76) with self-measurement of blood pressure and 68.54% (67.31-69.77); p<0.0001. Patients controlled by self-measurement of blood pressure took 2.58 (1.65-3.51) versus 2.97 (2.11-3.83) with clinical blood pressure measure; p<0.001. Being more frequent the use of fixed combinations. Obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, severity of hypertension, measurement method, number of drugs and age were associated with poorer control of the blood pressure; p<0.001. Conclusions: The degree of control with self-measurement of blood pressure is very high, compared with ambulatory monitoring, with important clinical significance. Although the characteristics of this study can not infer causality, this finding reinforces the recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the regularly use of the self-measurement of blood pressure in our daily practice.
自我测量血压(SMBP)有助于改善高血压控制程度吗?
背景和目的:自我测量血压可以更好地控制血压。本研究的目的是通过两种测量方法(临床测量血压和自我测量血压)来确定控制程度,并确定控制不良的相关因素。方法:多中心随机横断面研究在初级保健诊断和治疗的高血压患者。收集的资料包括:社会人口统计资料、个人病史、标准血液检查和动脉血压测量,包括自我测量血压和临床测量血压。控制目标包括自我测量血压(<135/85 mmHg)和临床测量血压(<140/90 mmHg)。数据以百分比和平均值表示,CI为95%。结果:514例患者(女性59.3%),平均年龄70.84(80.01 ~ 61.67)岁,高血压疾病发展时间10.37(14.87 ~ 5.62)年。自测血压的控制度为84.67% (83.58 ~ 85.76),68.54% (67.31 ~ 69.77);p < 0.0001。自我测血压组患者为2.58(1.65 ~ 3.51),临床测血压组为2.97 (2.11 ~ 3.83);p < 0.001。更频繁地使用固定组合。肥胖、糖尿病、高脂血症、心血管疾病、高血压严重程度、测量方法、用药次数和年龄与血压控制较差有关;p < 0.001。结论:与门诊监测相比,自我测量血压的控制程度很高,具有重要的临床意义。虽然这项研究的特点不能推断因果关系,但这一发现加强了临床实践指南的建议,即在日常实践中定期使用自我测量血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信