Internet delivered guided cognitive behavioral self-help for panic disorder: An open trial and benchmarking study

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Asher Y. Strauss , Asala Halaj , Dina Zalaznik , Isaac Fradkin , Benjamin A. Katz , Elad Zlotnick , Snir Barzilay , Gerhard Andersson , David Daniel Ebert , Jonathan D. Huppert
{"title":"Internet delivered guided cognitive behavioral self-help for panic disorder: An open trial and benchmarking study","authors":"Asher Y. Strauss ,&nbsp;Asala Halaj ,&nbsp;Dina Zalaznik ,&nbsp;Isaac Fradkin ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Katz ,&nbsp;Elad Zlotnick ,&nbsp;Snir Barzilay ,&nbsp;Gerhard Andersson ,&nbsp;David Daniel Ebert ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Huppert","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2021.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>An open trial of a therapist-guided internet cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) for panic disorder with and without agoraphobia<span> (PD/A) was conducted. Ninety adults diagnosed with PD/A were treated using ICBT adapted from a face to face (FTF) protocol. Results were benchmarked against two FTF samples, one at the same research site using the same protocol and another from a large cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) study. In addition, effects were compared to mean aggregated estimates from four meta-analyses. Attrition rates and therapist<span> time were also examined to facilitate cost-effectiveness analyses and inform policy makers. Both full intent-to-treat and completer samples were used when analyzing data. Overall, results suggest that within-group effects for ICBT (0.88 to 1.7) are similar to the effects found in the benchmarking samples and to effects across meta-analytic studies. Effects were larger for symptoms assessed by an independent evaluator compared to self-report measures. Treatment gains continued to increase 3 months after post treatment and were maintained at 6 month and 1 year follow-up. However, attrition rates in ICBT were twice as large (46%) compared to the FTF sample, possibly due to a more conservative definition of attrition used here compared to previous reports. Therapist time in ICBT was reduced by a factor of three (14</span></span></span> <!-->min/week) compared to FTF, suggesting that treatment effects can be maintained even when reducing therapist time. Taken together, these findings suggest good short and long-term efficacy and time efficiency along with greater attrition for ICBT, allowing for dissemination and enhancing accessibility to quality, evidence-based treatment in the community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979121000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An open trial of a therapist-guided internet cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) for panic disorder with and without agoraphobia (PD/A) was conducted. Ninety adults diagnosed with PD/A were treated using ICBT adapted from a face to face (FTF) protocol. Results were benchmarked against two FTF samples, one at the same research site using the same protocol and another from a large cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) study. In addition, effects were compared to mean aggregated estimates from four meta-analyses. Attrition rates and therapist time were also examined to facilitate cost-effectiveness analyses and inform policy makers. Both full intent-to-treat and completer samples were used when analyzing data. Overall, results suggest that within-group effects for ICBT (0.88 to 1.7) are similar to the effects found in the benchmarking samples and to effects across meta-analytic studies. Effects were larger for symptoms assessed by an independent evaluator compared to self-report measures. Treatment gains continued to increase 3 months after post treatment and were maintained at 6 month and 1 year follow-up. However, attrition rates in ICBT were twice as large (46%) compared to the FTF sample, possibly due to a more conservative definition of attrition used here compared to previous reports. Therapist time in ICBT was reduced by a factor of three (14 min/week) compared to FTF, suggesting that treatment effects can be maintained even when reducing therapist time. Taken together, these findings suggest good short and long-term efficacy and time efficiency along with greater attrition for ICBT, allowing for dissemination and enhancing accessibility to quality, evidence-based treatment in the community.

互联网为恐慌障碍提供引导认知行为自助:一项公开试验和基准研究
采用网络认知行为疗法(ICBT)治疗伴或不伴广场恐怖症(PD/ a)的临床试验。90名被诊断为PD/A的成年人采用面对面(FTF)方案的ICBT治疗。结果以两个FTF样本为基准,一个来自同一研究地点,使用相同的协议,另一个来自大型认知行为疗法(CBT)研究。此外,将效果与四项荟萃分析的平均汇总估计值进行比较。还检查了损失率和治疗师时间,以促进成本效益分析并为决策者提供信息。在分析数据时,使用了完全意向处理和完井样本。总体而言,结果表明,ICBT的组内效应(0.88至1.7)与基准样本中的效应和跨荟萃分析研究的效应相似。与自我报告相比,由独立评估者评估的症状效果更大。治疗后3个月治疗收益继续增加,并在6个月和1年的随访中保持不变。然而,与FTF样本相比,ICBT的流失率是前者的两倍(46%),这可能是由于与之前的报告相比,这里使用的流失率定义更为保守。与FTF相比,ICBT的治疗时间减少了三倍(14分钟/周),这表明即使减少了治疗时间,治疗效果也可以保持。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,ICBT具有良好的短期和长期疗效和时间效率,并具有更大的耗损性,从而可以在社区中传播并提高对高质量循证治疗的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信