Executive Function in Weight Loss Maintenance: The Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status

Casie H. Morgan, Kathryn King, G. Dutton, S. Mrug, Alena C. Borgatti, M. Gowey
{"title":"Executive Function in Weight Loss Maintenance: The Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status","authors":"Casie H. Morgan, Kathryn King, G. Dutton, S. Mrug, Alena C. Borgatti, M. Gowey","doi":"10.52214/gsjp.v19i.10056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few individuals with overweight/obesity maintain weight loss. Executive function (EF) and socioeconomic status (SES) contribute to weight loss maintenance (WLM). This study examined whether the relationship between EF and WLM differs across SES. Forty-four participants between 32-78 years of age were assessed ≥ 1-year post-      behavioral obesity intervention. Those who achieved >5% weight loss during the program were recruited for the present study. Participants (N = 44) previously lost >5% of initial body weight. Hierarchical regressions tested the moderating role of SES in the relationship between performance-based EF [Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)] or self-report EF [Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A)] and %WLM. The relationship between performance-based EF and %WLM varied across SES (p < .05). For those with high SES, a 1-point T-score increase on IGT corresponded with 4.5% greater %WLM (β = .52, p = .03). No association was observed for those with low SES (β = -.12, p = .54). For those with low SES, greater EF may not benefit WLM. For those with high SES, greater EF may benefit WLM. Personalized WLM interventions accounting for levels of SES and EF may best facilitate WLM.\nKeywords: executive function, weight loss maintenance, socioeconomic status, obesity","PeriodicalId":208098,"journal":{"name":"Graduate Student Journal of Psychology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graduate Student Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/gsjp.v19i.10056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few individuals with overweight/obesity maintain weight loss. Executive function (EF) and socioeconomic status (SES) contribute to weight loss maintenance (WLM). This study examined whether the relationship between EF and WLM differs across SES. Forty-four participants between 32-78 years of age were assessed ≥ 1-year post-      behavioral obesity intervention. Those who achieved >5% weight loss during the program were recruited for the present study. Participants (N = 44) previously lost >5% of initial body weight. Hierarchical regressions tested the moderating role of SES in the relationship between performance-based EF [Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)] or self-report EF [Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A)] and %WLM. The relationship between performance-based EF and %WLM varied across SES (p < .05). For those with high SES, a 1-point T-score increase on IGT corresponded with 4.5% greater %WLM (β = .52, p = .03). No association was observed for those with low SES (β = -.12, p = .54). For those with low SES, greater EF may not benefit WLM. For those with high SES, greater EF may benefit WLM. Personalized WLM interventions accounting for levels of SES and EF may best facilitate WLM. Keywords: executive function, weight loss maintenance, socioeconomic status, obesity
减肥维持的执行功能:社会经济地位的调节作用
很少有超重/肥胖的人能保持体重减轻。执行功能(EF)和社会经济地位(SES)有助于减肥维持(WLM)。本研究考察了EF和WLM之间的关系在不同的社会地位是否存在差异。44名年龄在32-78岁之间的参与者在行为肥胖干预后≥1年接受评估。那些在这个项目中体重减轻了50 - 5%的人被招募到本研究中。参与者(N = 44)先前减轻了初始体重的5%。层次回归检验了社会地位在基于绩效的EF[爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)]或自我报告EF[执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF-A)]与%WLM之间的关系中的调节作用。绩效EF与WLM之间的关系在不同社会阶层中存在差异(p < 0.05)。对于那些社会地位高的人来说,IGT t得分每增加1分,WLM %就会增加4.5% (β = 0.52, p = 0.03)。低社会经济地位者无相关性(β = -)。12, p = .54)。对于那些社会地位低的人来说,更高的EF可能对WLM没有好处。对于那些高SES的人来说,更大的EF可能有利于WLM。考虑到SES和EF水平的个性化WLM干预可能最有利于WLM。关键词:执行功能,减肥维持,社会经济地位,肥胖
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信