Roof System Suitability for IT Mission-Critical Facilities

Charles A. Petrinovich, C. Farnsworth, Justin E. Weidman, James P. Smith, E. Bingham
{"title":"Roof System Suitability for IT Mission-Critical Facilities","authors":"Charles A. Petrinovich, C. Farnsworth, Justin E. Weidman, James P. Smith, E. Bingham","doi":"10.22361/jfmer/151124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Information technology (IT) mission-critical facilities house operations that, when interrupted, can prove disastrous to an organization's operations. Limited market research is available to determine what roof system types are best suited to meet the unique demands of these buildings. The purpose of this research was to rate the suitability of commonly used roofing systems for IT mission-critical facilities and determine their associated lifecycle costs. This research was performed with a leading US based telecommunications company to help evaluate roofing system options used in their IT mission-critical facilities. A survey was administered to roofing professionals across the US to obtain lifecycle cost information and ratings for various roofing systems. The research found that single-ply roofs generally had lower annual lifecycle costs than built-up roofs, due to lower installation and removal costs and increasing life expectancies. Metal roofs also had a low annual lifecycle cost due to the longer estimated lifespan. On the other hand, lowest installation cost was not the governing factor for recommended selection of roof systems for IT mission-critical structures. Rather, built-up and metal roofs were rated highest by roofing professionals, for their value in mission-critical facilities, ultimately indicating a necessary prioritization for risk reduction versus cost savings.","PeriodicalId":168480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facility Management Education and Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facility Management Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22361/jfmer/151124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information technology (IT) mission-critical facilities house operations that, when interrupted, can prove disastrous to an organization's operations. Limited market research is available to determine what roof system types are best suited to meet the unique demands of these buildings. The purpose of this research was to rate the suitability of commonly used roofing systems for IT mission-critical facilities and determine their associated lifecycle costs. This research was performed with a leading US based telecommunications company to help evaluate roofing system options used in their IT mission-critical facilities. A survey was administered to roofing professionals across the US to obtain lifecycle cost information and ratings for various roofing systems. The research found that single-ply roofs generally had lower annual lifecycle costs than built-up roofs, due to lower installation and removal costs and increasing life expectancies. Metal roofs also had a low annual lifecycle cost due to the longer estimated lifespan. On the other hand, lowest installation cost was not the governing factor for recommended selection of roof systems for IT mission-critical structures. Rather, built-up and metal roofs were rated highest by roofing professionals, for their value in mission-critical facilities, ultimately indicating a necessary prioritization for risk reduction versus cost savings.
屋顶系统对IT关键任务设施的适用性
信息技术(IT)关键任务设施所容纳的操作一旦中断,可能会对组织的操作造成灾难性的影响。有限的市场研究可以确定什么样的屋顶系统类型最适合满足这些建筑物的独特需求。本研究的目的是评估IT关键任务设施常用屋面系统的适用性,并确定其相关的生命周期成本。这项研究是与美国一家领先的电信公司合作进行的,以帮助评估其IT关键任务设施中使用的屋顶系统选项。一项针对美国屋面专业人士的调查获得了各种屋面系统的生命周期成本信息和评级。研究发现,单层屋顶的年生命周期成本通常低于建筑屋顶,因为安装和拆除成本更低,预期寿命更长。金属屋顶也有较低的年生命周期成本,因为预计寿命更长。另一方面,最低的安装成本并不是IT关键任务结构的屋顶系统推荐选择的主导因素。相反,建筑屋顶和金属屋顶被屋顶专业人士评为最高,因为它们在关键任务设施中的价值,最终表明降低风险与节省成本之间的必要优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信