Dilution system identification methods for contrast ultrasound ejection fraction assessment

M. Mischi, A. Jansen, H. Korsten
{"title":"Dilution system identification methods for contrast ultrasound ejection fraction assessment","authors":"M. Mischi, A. Jansen, H. Korsten","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1602986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) measurements by image analysis techniques are typically time- consuming. Indicator dilution methods allow a fast EF mea- surement, but their application is limited due to the need for cardiac catheterization. The injection of an ultrasound contrast agent bolus permits a non-invasive indicator dilution curve (IDC) detection, however, a ventricular contrast injection remains necessary. We have recently proposed the use of LV dilution system identification methods for a minimally-invasive EF measurement, in which the contrast bolus is injected in an arm vein. In this paper, we present, validate, and compare two least-mean-squares (LMS) algorithms for the LV impulse response estimation and the LV EF assessment. The left atrium and LV IDC represent the input and output of the LV dilution system. In the first algorithm, the LV dilution impulse response is determined by the solution of the Wiener-Hopf equation and fitted by a mono-compartment model for the EF assessment. In the second algorithm, the LV impulse response is parameterized by the model before the application of the LMS algorithm. The algorithms are validated by 50 measurements in patients with EF between 10% and 80%. The measurements are compared with echocardiographic bi-plane estimates after contrast opacification. The correlation coefficients are 0.68 and 0.88 and the standard deviations are 11.8% and 8.1% for the first and second algorithm, respectively. We may conclude that EF measurements by contrast echocardiography are feasible. Adding a priori knowledge in the system identification algo- rithm leads to an increased accuracy of the measurement.","PeriodicalId":302030,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1602986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) measurements by image analysis techniques are typically time- consuming. Indicator dilution methods allow a fast EF mea- surement, but their application is limited due to the need for cardiac catheterization. The injection of an ultrasound contrast agent bolus permits a non-invasive indicator dilution curve (IDC) detection, however, a ventricular contrast injection remains necessary. We have recently proposed the use of LV dilution system identification methods for a minimally-invasive EF measurement, in which the contrast bolus is injected in an arm vein. In this paper, we present, validate, and compare two least-mean-squares (LMS) algorithms for the LV impulse response estimation and the LV EF assessment. The left atrium and LV IDC represent the input and output of the LV dilution system. In the first algorithm, the LV dilution impulse response is determined by the solution of the Wiener-Hopf equation and fitted by a mono-compartment model for the EF assessment. In the second algorithm, the LV impulse response is parameterized by the model before the application of the LMS algorithm. The algorithms are validated by 50 measurements in patients with EF between 10% and 80%. The measurements are compared with echocardiographic bi-plane estimates after contrast opacification. The correlation coefficients are 0.68 and 0.88 and the standard deviations are 11.8% and 8.1% for the first and second algorithm, respectively. We may conclude that EF measurements by contrast echocardiography are feasible. Adding a priori knowledge in the system identification algo- rithm leads to an increased accuracy of the measurement.
对比超声射血分数评价的稀释系统鉴定方法
标准左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)的图像分析技术测量通常是耗时的。指示剂稀释法可以快速测量EF,但由于需要心导管,其应用受到限制。超声造影剂丸的注射允许无创指标稀释曲线(IDC)检测,然而,心室造影剂注射仍然是必要的。我们最近提出使用LV稀释系统识别方法进行微创EF测量,将造影剂注入手臂静脉。在本文中,我们提出,验证并比较了两种最小均方(LMS)算法用于低压脉冲响应估计和低压EF评估。左心房和左室IDC分别代表左室稀释系统的输入和输出。在第一种算法中,LV稀释脉冲响应由Wiener-Hopf方程的解确定,并由EF评估的单室模型拟合。在第二种算法中,在应用LMS算法之前,先用模型对低压脉冲响应进行参数化。通过对EF在10%到80%之间的患者进行50次测量,验证了算法的有效性。对比浊化后的测量结果与超声心动图双平面估计值进行比较。第一种和第二种算法的相关系数分别为0.68和0.88,标准差分别为11.8%和8.1%。我们可以得出结论,超声心动图造影测量EF是可行的。在系统辨识算法中加入先验知识可以提高测量的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信