Methods for comparing digital applications in buildings and districts

Felix Rehmann, F. Cudok, Rita Streblow
{"title":"Methods for comparing digital applications in buildings and districts","authors":"Felix Rehmann, F. Cudok, Rita Streblow","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ac9710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called Energiewende is a complex task with a variety of stakeholders, regulations, technical infrastructure, and proposed solutions. Buildings are an important sector for increasing resource and energy efficiency, as in Germany around 35% of end energy usage can be attributed to them. Digital applications can help reduce these emissions through more efficient planning, operating, renovation, or demolition. Depending on the task and the parties involved, the complexity of descriptions and data models can vary from simple energy efficiency labels used in the labeling process of buildings to complex individual data models used for simulation. However, these specific information systems are often non-transferable, are hard to compare in their restrictions and requirements, and hence increase the overall costs of digital solutions. A good understanding is needed to preserve economic and ecological benefits while maintaining privacy and security aspects. To compare digital applications, a variety of solutions are identified. This paper first provides an overview of the identified solutions, namely frameworks, taxonomies, and ontologies. While the identified frameworks focus more on technological aspects and are complex to use, they provide an in-depth understanding. Taxonomies can be used for a scientific (e.g., classification of methods) comparison and provide simple relationships. Ontologies provide relationships and definitions while being task-dependent. We conclude that comparing the underlying data models of digital applications is a complex task and dependent on the application and its infrastructure. However, a variety of tasks refers to the same tools and data. After discussing these approaches, we then give an overview of digital applications developed by German researchers. Last, we give an insight on how to combine these aspects in our ongoing research. To summarize, in this paper we give an overview of the complexity involved in transferring digital solutions in the building sector, provide a method used for comparing applications and describe a solution to compare infrastructure and digital tools built for it.","PeriodicalId":309041,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac9710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The so-called Energiewende is a complex task with a variety of stakeholders, regulations, technical infrastructure, and proposed solutions. Buildings are an important sector for increasing resource and energy efficiency, as in Germany around 35% of end energy usage can be attributed to them. Digital applications can help reduce these emissions through more efficient planning, operating, renovation, or demolition. Depending on the task and the parties involved, the complexity of descriptions and data models can vary from simple energy efficiency labels used in the labeling process of buildings to complex individual data models used for simulation. However, these specific information systems are often non-transferable, are hard to compare in their restrictions and requirements, and hence increase the overall costs of digital solutions. A good understanding is needed to preserve economic and ecological benefits while maintaining privacy and security aspects. To compare digital applications, a variety of solutions are identified. This paper first provides an overview of the identified solutions, namely frameworks, taxonomies, and ontologies. While the identified frameworks focus more on technological aspects and are complex to use, they provide an in-depth understanding. Taxonomies can be used for a scientific (e.g., classification of methods) comparison and provide simple relationships. Ontologies provide relationships and definitions while being task-dependent. We conclude that comparing the underlying data models of digital applications is a complex task and dependent on the application and its infrastructure. However, a variety of tasks refers to the same tools and data. After discussing these approaches, we then give an overview of digital applications developed by German researchers. Last, we give an insight on how to combine these aspects in our ongoing research. To summarize, in this paper we give an overview of the complexity involved in transferring digital solutions in the building sector, provide a method used for comparing applications and describe a solution to compare infrastructure and digital tools built for it.
数字应用在建筑和区域的比较方法
所谓的能源转型是一项复杂的任务,涉及各种利益相关者、法规、技术基础设施和拟议的解决方案。建筑是提高资源和能源效率的重要部门,因为在德国,大约35%的最终能源使用可归因于建筑。数字应用程序可以通过更有效的规划、运营、翻新或拆除来帮助减少这些排放。根据任务和涉及的各方,描述和数据模型的复杂性可以从建筑物标记过程中使用的简单能源效率标签到用于模拟的复杂单个数据模型。然而,这些特定的信息系统通常是不可转移的,在其限制和要求方面很难进行比较,因此增加了数字解决方案的总体成本。在保持隐私和安全方面的同时,需要很好地理解经济和生态效益。为了比较数字应用程序,确定了各种解决方案。本文首先概述了已确定的解决方案,即框架、分类法和本体。虽然已确定的框架更多地关注技术方面,并且使用起来很复杂,但它们提供了深入的理解。分类法可以用于科学的比较(例如,方法的分类)并提供简单的关系。本体提供了与任务相关的关系和定义。我们得出结论,比较数字应用程序的底层数据模型是一项复杂的任务,并且取决于应用程序及其基础设施。然而,各种各样的任务指的是相同的工具和数据。在讨论了这些方法之后,我们对德国研究人员开发的数字应用程序进行了概述。最后,我们给出了如何在我们正在进行的研究中结合这些方面的见解。总之,在本文中,我们概述了在建筑领域转移数字解决方案所涉及的复杂性,提供了一种用于比较应用程序的方法,并描述了一种比较基础设施和为其构建的数字工具的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信