Students' Mathematical Communication Skills in Terms of Concrete and Abstract Sequential Thinking Styles

L. Utami, I. Pramudya, I. Slamet
{"title":"Students' Mathematical Communication Skills in Terms of Concrete and Abstract Sequential Thinking Styles","authors":"L. Utami, I. Pramudya, I. Slamet","doi":"10.24042/ajpm.v11i2.7486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze and describe the eleventh-grade senior high school students' mathematical communication skills on linear program material in terms of concrete and abstract sequential thinking styles. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach with the case study method. The sampling technique used was the purposive sampling technique. The mathematical communication skills test and thinking style questionnaires were employed as the data collecting technique. The analysis revealed that subjects in the AS category could make generalizations based on good reasoning in the written text aspect. On the other hand, subjects in the CS category were having a hard time constructing abstract assumptions. In the drawing aspect, subjects in the AS category showed good theories and concept understanding. In contrast, subjects in the CS category were only able to apply some of the information to draw graphs. In mathematical expressions, subjects in the AS category could process the information implied by the problem to make mathematical models correctly. Meanwhile, subjects in the CS category needed additional information or direction to understand the information to avoid mistakes. ","PeriodicalId":385020,"journal":{"name":"Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i2.7486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and describe the eleventh-grade senior high school students' mathematical communication skills on linear program material in terms of concrete and abstract sequential thinking styles. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach with the case study method. The sampling technique used was the purposive sampling technique. The mathematical communication skills test and thinking style questionnaires were employed as the data collecting technique. The analysis revealed that subjects in the AS category could make generalizations based on good reasoning in the written text aspect. On the other hand, subjects in the CS category were having a hard time constructing abstract assumptions. In the drawing aspect, subjects in the AS category showed good theories and concept understanding. In contrast, subjects in the CS category were only able to apply some of the information to draw graphs. In mathematical expressions, subjects in the AS category could process the information implied by the problem to make mathematical models correctly. Meanwhile, subjects in the CS category needed additional information or direction to understand the information to avoid mistakes. 
从具体与抽象顺序思维方式看学生的数学沟通能力
本研究旨在分析和描述高二学生在线性程序材料上的数学沟通能力,包括具体的和抽象的顺序思维方式。本研究采用个案研究的定性描述方法。使用的抽样技术是有目的抽样技术。采用数理沟通能力测验和思维方式问卷作为数据收集方法。分析显示,AS类别的被试可以在书面文本方面基于良好的推理进行概括。另一方面,CS类别的受试者很难构建抽象假设。在绘画方面,AS类被试表现出较好的理论和概念理解能力。相比之下,CS组的受试者只能应用部分信息来绘制图形。在数学表达式中,AS类被试能够对问题隐含的信息进行处理,从而正确地建立数学模型。同时,CS类别的被试需要额外的信息或方向来理解信息以避免错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信