1. State Engagement in the Handicraft Sector

{"title":"1. State Engagement in the Handicraft Sector","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9789048537938-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Textual and material evidence shows that since the Shang dynasty (ca. sixteenth to eleventh century B.C.), workshops for manufacturing and construction existed. They provided weapons and objects for ceremonial and everyday use for the court and the ruling elite and planned and executed great central building projects like palaces, city walls, and funerary monuments. A great number of bronze vessels were produced for the ceremonial use of the rulers. Archeologists have calculated that it would have taken 18 years ‒ if 10,000 earth pounders were engaged for 330 days per year ‒ to complete the stamped-earth city walls of an early Shang city located in the vicinity of modern Zhengzhou in Henan.1 Both cases suggest that the work organization lay in the hands of specialized groups who could command great and, in the case of the bronze casters, highly skilled manpower. These workers and artisans most probably stood in the immediate service of the rulers and were supervised by their off icials.2 Production and construction for the service of the state have been incorporated in various ways into the institutional frameworks of the ruling dynasties from that time onward. Between the third century B.C. and the tenth century A.D., government and civilian crafts and industries co-existed, and more state activist and more laissez-faire periods alternated in the longer dynasties of the Han and Tang. The short precursor dynasties Qin and Sui maintained a high degree of state activism, which was one of the reasons for their premature end. The labour force especially for building, but also in the workshops, often had to serve the state in corvée obligations or in slavery, but the level of unfree labour apparently diminished after having reached its apex in the Northern and Southern Dynasties and the Sui. In 494 A.D., permanent work obligations were f irst reported to have been replaced by work shifts from the Liu-Song of the Southern Dynasties.3 The shift system was used time and again in subsequent dynasties until the f irst years of the Qing. A","PeriodicalId":199695,"journal":{"name":"State and Crafts in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Crafts in the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048537938-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Textual and material evidence shows that since the Shang dynasty (ca. sixteenth to eleventh century B.C.), workshops for manufacturing and construction existed. They provided weapons and objects for ceremonial and everyday use for the court and the ruling elite and planned and executed great central building projects like palaces, city walls, and funerary monuments. A great number of bronze vessels were produced for the ceremonial use of the rulers. Archeologists have calculated that it would have taken 18 years ‒ if 10,000 earth pounders were engaged for 330 days per year ‒ to complete the stamped-earth city walls of an early Shang city located in the vicinity of modern Zhengzhou in Henan.1 Both cases suggest that the work organization lay in the hands of specialized groups who could command great and, in the case of the bronze casters, highly skilled manpower. These workers and artisans most probably stood in the immediate service of the rulers and were supervised by their off icials.2 Production and construction for the service of the state have been incorporated in various ways into the institutional frameworks of the ruling dynasties from that time onward. Between the third century B.C. and the tenth century A.D., government and civilian crafts and industries co-existed, and more state activist and more laissez-faire periods alternated in the longer dynasties of the Han and Tang. The short precursor dynasties Qin and Sui maintained a high degree of state activism, which was one of the reasons for their premature end. The labour force especially for building, but also in the workshops, often had to serve the state in corvée obligations or in slavery, but the level of unfree labour apparently diminished after having reached its apex in the Northern and Southern Dynasties and the Sui. In 494 A.D., permanent work obligations were f irst reported to have been replaced by work shifts from the Liu-Song of the Southern Dynasties.3 The shift system was used time and again in subsequent dynasties until the f irst years of the Qing. A
1. 国家手工业经营
文字和物质证据表明,自商朝(约公元前16世纪至公元前11世纪)以来,就有了制造和建筑的工场。他们为宫廷和统治精英提供仪式和日常使用的武器和物品,并规划和执行大型中央建筑项目,如宫殿、城墙和葬礼纪念碑。大量的青铜器皿被制造出来供统治者在仪式上使用。考古学家计算出,如果10000个捣土工每年工作330天,则需要18年的时间才能完成位于现代河南郑州附近的一座商朝早期城市的夯土城墙。这两个案例都表明,这项工作的组织掌握在专业团队的手中,他们可以指挥大量的,在青铜铸工的情况下,是高技能的人力。这些工人和工匠很可能直接为统治者服务,并由他们的官员监督从那时起,为国家服务的生产和建设就以各种方式被纳入统治王朝的制度框架。在公元前3世纪到公元10世纪之间,政府和民间手工业共存,在更长的汉唐王朝中,更多的国家激进主义和更多的自由放任主义交替出现。短暂的前朝秦、隋保持了高度的国家能动主义,这是其过早灭亡的原因之一。劳动力,尤其是建筑工人,以及工场工人,通常不得不为国家提供徭役或奴役,但在南北朝和隋朝达到顶峰后,非自由劳动力的水平明显减少了。公元494年,据报道,从南朝刘宋开始,长期的劳动义务首次被轮班制所取代。轮班制在后来的朝代中一再使用,直到清朝元年。一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信