13 Economic Development under the Greek Kingdoms of Central Asia to the Kushan Empire: Empire, Migration, and Monasteries

L. Morris
{"title":"13 Economic Development under the Greek Kingdoms of Central Asia to the Kushan Empire: Empire, Migration, and Monasteries","authors":"L. Morris","doi":"10.1515/9783110607642-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the development of the economy under and between two successive empires emergent from the Central Asian region of ancient Bactria. These are the Greek Kingdoms of Central Asia (the Graeco-Bactrian and Indo-Greek Kingdoms, ca. 250 –10 ) and the Kushan Empire (ca. 50–350 ). Here, I focus on the core regions of Bactria and Gandhāra, although when available data permits, I look to other regions within and beyond the empires under examination. The character of the available evidence for looking at economic development in this period, of course, presents a litany of limitations that make it impossible to achieve a finegrained historical perspective on these processes.1 That being said, it is certainly possible to observe broader trends at play – although it should be reiterated that development throughout this period was not necessarily linear – and identify some of the major catalysts instigating these changes. I begin by describing three key catalysts: the phenomenon of empire, increasing migration, and the growing influence of Buddhist monasteries. Then, I look at key processes of development that characterize the period under study, and examine the role of empire, migration, and monasteries in helping to drive them. These processes are changes in settlement patterns, urbanization, and agricultural extensification, in addition to an increase in volume and specialization in production, and ultimately intensifying connectivity and coordination both within regions, as well as across increasingly broad spaces – crucially, between southern Central Asia and northern India. Of course, from a wider historical perspective, these processes were neither inherently new, nor inscribed onto a blank slate. In southern Central Asia, urbanization phases had already begun in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Agricultural production had drawn on artificial irrigation since the Neolithic in Bactria, and double-cropping was practiced since the Bronze Age in the Swat Valley.2 Sedentary agriculturalists and mobile pastoralists had cultivated symbiotic relationships from at least the","PeriodicalId":128613,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607642-021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines the development of the economy under and between two successive empires emergent from the Central Asian region of ancient Bactria. These are the Greek Kingdoms of Central Asia (the Graeco-Bactrian and Indo-Greek Kingdoms, ca. 250 –10 ) and the Kushan Empire (ca. 50–350 ). Here, I focus on the core regions of Bactria and Gandhāra, although when available data permits, I look to other regions within and beyond the empires under examination. The character of the available evidence for looking at economic development in this period, of course, presents a litany of limitations that make it impossible to achieve a finegrained historical perspective on these processes.1 That being said, it is certainly possible to observe broader trends at play – although it should be reiterated that development throughout this period was not necessarily linear – and identify some of the major catalysts instigating these changes. I begin by describing three key catalysts: the phenomenon of empire, increasing migration, and the growing influence of Buddhist monasteries. Then, I look at key processes of development that characterize the period under study, and examine the role of empire, migration, and monasteries in helping to drive them. These processes are changes in settlement patterns, urbanization, and agricultural extensification, in addition to an increase in volume and specialization in production, and ultimately intensifying connectivity and coordination both within regions, as well as across increasingly broad spaces – crucially, between southern Central Asia and northern India. Of course, from a wider historical perspective, these processes were neither inherently new, nor inscribed onto a blank slate. In southern Central Asia, urbanization phases had already begun in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Agricultural production had drawn on artificial irrigation since the Neolithic in Bactria, and double-cropping was practiced since the Bronze Age in the Swat Valley.2 Sedentary agriculturalists and mobile pastoralists had cultivated symbiotic relationships from at least the
从中亚希腊王国到贵霜帝国的经济发展:帝国、移民和修道院
本章考察了在古代大夏中亚地区出现的两个连续帝国之下和之间的经济发展。这些是中亚的希腊王国(希腊-大夏和印度-希腊王国,约250-10)和贵霜帝国(约50-350)。在这里,我关注的是大夏和Gandhāra的核心地区,尽管当可用数据允许时,我也会关注帝国内外的其他地区。当然,观察这一时期经济发展的现有证据的特点,呈现出一连串的局限性,使我们不可能对这些过程取得细致入微的历史观点话虽如此,当然有可能观察到更广泛的趋势在起作用- -尽管应该重申,整个这一时期的发展不一定是线性的- -并确定引起这些变化的一些主要催化剂。我首先描述了三个关键的催化剂:帝国现象,不断增加的移民,以及佛教寺院日益增长的影响力。然后,我考察了所研究时期的主要发展过程,并考察了帝国、移民和修道院在推动这些发展过程中的作用。这些过程包括定居模式、城市化和农业推广的变化,以及产量和专业化的增加,并最终加强区域内以及日益广阔的空间之间的连通性和协调——最重要的是中亚南部和印度北部之间。当然,从更广泛的历史角度来看,这些过程本身既不是新的,也不是刻在一块空白石板上的。在中亚南部,城市化阶段早在青铜和铁器时代就开始了。农业生产从大夏的新石器时代就开始采用人工灌溉,而斯瓦特山谷从青铜时代就开始实行复种。2定居的农人和流动的牧民至少从西元开始就建立了共生关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信