Productivity Growth in Romania: A Firm-Level Analysis

Mariana Iootty, Jorge O. Pena, Donato De Rosa
{"title":"Productivity Growth in Romania: A Firm-Level Analysis","authors":"Mariana Iootty, Jorge O. Pena, Donato De Rosa","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-9043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines productivity growth in Romania using balance sheet data for a census of Romanian firms in 2011-17. Three measures of productivity are estimated: labor productivity, revenue total factor productivity, and revenue total factor productivity adjusted for markups. Drawing from these measures, the paper follows a two-step approach to answer two fundamental questions: (i) who are the firms -- and what are their key characteristics -- driving and dragging productivity growth in Romania? and (ii) what are the drivers behind productivity expansion? A first step of the analysis characterizes productivity leaders and laggards, finding that companies at the domestic productivity frontier are older and larger, have higher capital intensity, and pay higher wages. Domestic market leaders charge higher markups, especially in manufacturing, but are not becoming more efficient. A second step of the analysis decomposes aggregate productivity growth and finds that reallocation of market shares to more efficient players has been the main driver in manufacturing but not in services, which are typically more sheltered from competition. At the same time, individual firms are becoming less productive, suggesting that there is scope to improve firm capabilities, particularly in services. These findings suggest a policy agenda for Romania centered on removing distortions to competition and boosting human capital.","PeriodicalId":444500,"journal":{"name":"World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper examines productivity growth in Romania using balance sheet data for a census of Romanian firms in 2011-17. Three measures of productivity are estimated: labor productivity, revenue total factor productivity, and revenue total factor productivity adjusted for markups. Drawing from these measures, the paper follows a two-step approach to answer two fundamental questions: (i) who are the firms -- and what are their key characteristics -- driving and dragging productivity growth in Romania? and (ii) what are the drivers behind productivity expansion? A first step of the analysis characterizes productivity leaders and laggards, finding that companies at the domestic productivity frontier are older and larger, have higher capital intensity, and pay higher wages. Domestic market leaders charge higher markups, especially in manufacturing, but are not becoming more efficient. A second step of the analysis decomposes aggregate productivity growth and finds that reallocation of market shares to more efficient players has been the main driver in manufacturing but not in services, which are typically more sheltered from competition. At the same time, individual firms are becoming less productive, suggesting that there is scope to improve firm capabilities, particularly in services. These findings suggest a policy agenda for Romania centered on removing distortions to competition and boosting human capital.
罗马尼亚生产率增长:一个企业层面的分析
本文使用2011-17年罗马尼亚企业普查的资产负债表数据来检验罗马尼亚的生产率增长。对生产率的三个衡量标准进行了估计:劳动生产率、收入全要素生产率和收入全要素生产率。根据这些措施,本文采用两步方法来回答两个基本问题:(i)哪些公司——以及它们的关键特征是什么——推动和拖累了罗马尼亚的生产率增长?(二)生产率扩张背后的驱动因素是什么?分析的第一步是对生产率领先者和落后者的特征进行分析,发现国内生产率前沿的公司历史更悠久,规模更大,资本密集度更高,工资也更高。国内市场的领导者收取更高的加成,尤其是在制造业,但并没有变得更有效率。分析的第二步对总生产率增长进行了分解,发现市场份额向效率更高的参与者的再分配一直是制造业的主要推动力,但服务业并非如此,因为服务业通常更不受竞争的影响。与此同时,个别企业的生产率正在下降,这表明企业的能力仍有提高空间,尤其是在服务业方面。这些发现表明,罗马尼亚的政策议程应以消除对竞争的扭曲和提高人力资本为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信