Jesus: Made in America

Westbrook Matt
{"title":"Jesus: Made in America","authors":"Westbrook Matt","doi":"10.3138/JRPC.24.3.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new millennium has brought with it much attention to the cultural production and reproduction of the historical Jesus. In 2004, Stephen Prothero’s American Jesus (a trade book) and Richard Wrightman Fox’s Jesus in America (a work of cultural history) shared the unfortunate timing of having their works come out in the same year. To this is now added Stephen Nichol’s 2008 contribution. Nichols, an evangelical insider, seeks to add to this genre by focusing sharply on the American Evangelical Jesus, and, as a theologian, to provide an assessment of what he perceives to be abuses of Jesus by those within his tradition (13–14, 17). The addition of a theological perspective to the genre is what makes Nichols’s work unique, and the reader should approach the book with this in mind. Relative to the contributions in Wrightman Fox and Prothero the strength of Nichols’s book lies in two specific areas: the career expertise of Nichols as a scholar of Puritanism and a strong critique of the commercialization of Christianity. Often this critique includes a focus on how economic decisions—such as the inclusion of an advertisement for the decidedly unorthodox Jefferson Bible as a Christian devotional resource in The Moody Monthly (68)—lead to (apparent) capitulation on critical theological issues. The work of moving Jesus products does not, Nichols demonstrates, involve a test of product orthodoxy prior to hitting the shelves. Such a dollars-over-theological-sense approach, not surprisingly, has increased dramatically in the last half-century, as is evident in Nichols’s chapter on the development of Christian Contemporary Music (CCM). In the 1990s, when ad agencies were preaching that marketing was really about evangelism (the secular side of the phenomenon, leveraging religious references, is popularly called “cult branding”; see D. Atkin’s The Culting of Brands [2004] for one of many examples), mega-churches (Willow Creek, most famously) were bursting onto the scene, trumpeting the idea that evangelism was all about marketing. Nichols reminds us that this conversation is not over and warns us to look behind “biblical” and “bible-based” descriptors of Christian products, as these phrases have become (have always been?) little more than branding monikers (79). There are a number of specific cultural appeasements to which Nichols takes offence, from Stone and Campbell allowing the Western frontier to shape their theology, to Max Lucado’s hyper-familiar, golfing-buddy Jesus doing the same in our time, to the parallel institutionalism of the mass Christian culture industry exemplified in CCM and Christian t-shirt and bumper-sticker companies. These discussions are not at all superficial. For instance, Nichols explores the effects on the message of the biblical text as he sees it, of a culture that requires participation through “consumptive behavior” (184). His analysis is quite helpful in posing important questions to Evangelical Christianity about its own identity. The solution he advocates, implied throughout the book, is twofold: predictably, a self-limiting of authors and preachers to the pages of the bible, and a return to the creeds as a source of theological grounding. While this is probably all that really can be done to minimize (not eliminate) the effects American culture has on Christian theology—everyone stands from somewhere and no one truly escapes his or her culture, particularly in theology—Nichols fails to note that creedal","PeriodicalId":219603,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JRPC.24.3.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new millennium has brought with it much attention to the cultural production and reproduction of the historical Jesus. In 2004, Stephen Prothero’s American Jesus (a trade book) and Richard Wrightman Fox’s Jesus in America (a work of cultural history) shared the unfortunate timing of having their works come out in the same year. To this is now added Stephen Nichol’s 2008 contribution. Nichols, an evangelical insider, seeks to add to this genre by focusing sharply on the American Evangelical Jesus, and, as a theologian, to provide an assessment of what he perceives to be abuses of Jesus by those within his tradition (13–14, 17). The addition of a theological perspective to the genre is what makes Nichols’s work unique, and the reader should approach the book with this in mind. Relative to the contributions in Wrightman Fox and Prothero the strength of Nichols’s book lies in two specific areas: the career expertise of Nichols as a scholar of Puritanism and a strong critique of the commercialization of Christianity. Often this critique includes a focus on how economic decisions—such as the inclusion of an advertisement for the decidedly unorthodox Jefferson Bible as a Christian devotional resource in The Moody Monthly (68)—lead to (apparent) capitulation on critical theological issues. The work of moving Jesus products does not, Nichols demonstrates, involve a test of product orthodoxy prior to hitting the shelves. Such a dollars-over-theological-sense approach, not surprisingly, has increased dramatically in the last half-century, as is evident in Nichols’s chapter on the development of Christian Contemporary Music (CCM). In the 1990s, when ad agencies were preaching that marketing was really about evangelism (the secular side of the phenomenon, leveraging religious references, is popularly called “cult branding”; see D. Atkin’s The Culting of Brands [2004] for one of many examples), mega-churches (Willow Creek, most famously) were bursting onto the scene, trumpeting the idea that evangelism was all about marketing. Nichols reminds us that this conversation is not over and warns us to look behind “biblical” and “bible-based” descriptors of Christian products, as these phrases have become (have always been?) little more than branding monikers (79). There are a number of specific cultural appeasements to which Nichols takes offence, from Stone and Campbell allowing the Western frontier to shape their theology, to Max Lucado’s hyper-familiar, golfing-buddy Jesus doing the same in our time, to the parallel institutionalism of the mass Christian culture industry exemplified in CCM and Christian t-shirt and bumper-sticker companies. These discussions are not at all superficial. For instance, Nichols explores the effects on the message of the biblical text as he sees it, of a culture that requires participation through “consumptive behavior” (184). His analysis is quite helpful in posing important questions to Evangelical Christianity about its own identity. The solution he advocates, implied throughout the book, is twofold: predictably, a self-limiting of authors and preachers to the pages of the bible, and a return to the creeds as a source of theological grounding. While this is probably all that really can be done to minimize (not eliminate) the effects American culture has on Christian theology—everyone stands from somewhere and no one truly escapes his or her culture, particularly in theology—Nichols fails to note that creedal
耶稣:美国制造
新千年带来了对历史上耶稣的文化生产和复制的关注。2004年,斯蒂芬·普罗西罗的《美国耶稣》(一本大众书籍)和理查德·赖特曼·福克斯的《美国耶稣》(一本文化史著作)不幸地在同一年出版。再加上斯蒂芬·尼科尔2008年的贡献。作为福音派内部人士,Nichols试图通过关注美国福音派的耶稣来增加这一流派,并作为一名神学家,对他所认为的那些在他的传统中对耶稣的滥用进行评估(13 - 14,17)。在这一流派中加入神学视角是尼科尔斯作品的独特之处,读者应该带着这一点来读这本书。相对于莱特曼·福克斯和普罗西罗的贡献,尼科尔斯这本书的优势在于两个具体领域:尼科尔斯作为清教学者的职业专长和对基督教商业化的强烈批评。这种批评通常包括对经济决策的关注——比如在《穆迪月刊》(1968)上刊登了一则广告,将绝对非正统的《杰斐逊圣经》作为基督教的灵修资源——导致(明显的)在关键的神学问题上投降。尼科尔斯指出,运送耶稣产品的工作并不包括在上架前对产品的正统性进行测试。毫不奇怪,在过去的半个世纪里,这种金钱至上的神学观念急剧增加,这在尼科尔斯关于基督教当代音乐(CCM)发展的章节中很明显。上世纪90年代,广告公司鼓吹营销其实就是传福音(这种现象的世俗一面,利用宗教参考,被普遍称为“邪教品牌”);参见D.阿特金的《品牌崇拜》[2004],其中有许多例子),大型教堂(最著名的是柳溪教堂)涌现出来,鼓吹传福音就是营销。尼科尔斯提醒我们,这场对话还没有结束,并警告我们要在“圣经”和“基于圣经”的基督教产品描述背后寻找答案,因为这些短语已经(一直是?)只不过是品牌的绰号(79)。有许多特定的文化安抚令尼科尔斯感到愤怒,从斯通和坎贝尔允许西部边疆塑造他们的神学,到马克斯·卢卡多(Max Lucado)非常熟悉的高尔夫球友耶稣(Jesus)在我们这个时代做同样的事情,再到以CCM和基督教t恤和汽车贴纸公司为例的大众基督教文化工业的平行制度主义。这些讨论一点也不肤浅。例如,Nichols探讨了他所看到的一种需要通过“消费行为”参与的文化对圣经文本信息的影响(184)。他的分析对福音派基督教提出了关于其自身身份的重要问题,非常有帮助。他主张的解决方案,贯穿全书,是双重的:可以预见的是,作者和传教士将自我限制在圣经的页面上,并将信条作为神学基础的来源。虽然这可能是所有真正可以做的,以减少(而不是消除)美国文化对基督教神学的影响——每个人都有自己的立场,没有人真正逃离他或她的文化,特别是在神学上——尼科尔斯没有注意到这一信条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信