Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Ultrasound Pachymetry and Non-Contact Specular Microscopy in Normal Eyes

M. Kareem, Muhemin A. Kadim
{"title":"Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Ultrasound Pachymetry and Non-Contact Specular Microscopy in Normal Eyes","authors":"M. Kareem, Muhemin A. Kadim","doi":"10.55945/joasnt.2022.1.2.47-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central corneal thickness measurement plays a crucial role in the assessment and treatment of glaucoma and several corneal diseases in addition to its importance in refractive surgery management. There are various methods for central corneal thickness measurement, which differ in their operating principles and technology beside the difference in their advantages and limitation. This study aims to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values of healthy eyes measured by two common devices: ultrasound pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM) and to determine the average difference between the two measurements. The study was conducted in the ophthalmology outpatient clinic in Imam Al-Sadiq Hospital- Hilla city and included 99 healthy individuals (198 eyes) of both genders. Results indicated that NCSM tends to give thinner CCT values compared to UP while providing quicker, safer and more comfortable evaluation for corneal thickness in addition to corneal endothelial cell density.","PeriodicalId":376434,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Nanotechnology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Nanotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55945/joasnt.2022.1.2.47-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central corneal thickness measurement plays a crucial role in the assessment and treatment of glaucoma and several corneal diseases in addition to its importance in refractive surgery management. There are various methods for central corneal thickness measurement, which differ in their operating principles and technology beside the difference in their advantages and limitation. This study aims to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values of healthy eyes measured by two common devices: ultrasound pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM) and to determine the average difference between the two measurements. The study was conducted in the ophthalmology outpatient clinic in Imam Al-Sadiq Hospital- Hilla city and included 99 healthy individuals (198 eyes) of both genders. Results indicated that NCSM tends to give thinner CCT values compared to UP while providing quicker, safer and more comfortable evaluation for corneal thickness in addition to corneal endothelial cell density.
超声测厚法与非接触式镜面显微镜测量正常眼角膜中央厚度的比较
除了在屈光手术管理中具有重要意义外,角膜中央厚度测量在青光眼和多种角膜疾病的评估和治疗中也起着至关重要的作用。角膜中央厚度测量方法多种多样,其工作原理和技术各不相同,优点和局限性也各不相同。本研究旨在比较两种常用仪器:超声测厚仪(UP)和非接触式反射显微镜(NCSM)测量健康眼睛的角膜中央厚度(CCT)值,并确定两种测量值之间的平均差异。这项研究是在希勒市伊玛目萨迪克医院眼科门诊进行的,包括99名男女健康个体(198只眼睛)。结果表明,与UP相比,NCSM给出的CCT值更薄,同时对角膜厚度和角膜内皮细胞密度提供更快、更安全、更舒适的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信