Biological control in Bolivia.

J. Franco, L. V. Crespo, Y. Colmenárez, J. C. Lenteren
{"title":"Biological control in Bolivia.","authors":"J. Franco, L. V. Crespo, Y. Colmenárez, J. C. Lenteren","doi":"10.1079/9781789242430.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n A number of introductions of parasitoids and predators were carried out in the 1950s for classical biological control of olive scale, woolly apple aphid, white peach scale, Mediterranean fruit fly and Anastrepha fruit fly, with control of cottony cushion scale by the coccinellid Rodolia being a particular success. In 1963, dipteran natural enemies were introduced for the control of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp. Since 1963 native hymenopteran and dipteran parasitoids have been field collected and re-released for control of the borers. In 1969 an IPM programme of sugarcane borers was started, and biocontrol in sugarcane in the period 1970-2000 mainly consisted of augmentative releases of hymenopteran and tachinid parasitoids. Another successful IPM programme dealt with control of potato moth species with a product - now commercially available - that contains a native strain of the granulosis virus Baculovirus phthorimaea and a native strain of Bacillus thuringiensis. Coffee berry borer was brought under biocontrol in the 1990s by releasing a hymenopteran parasitoid and application of an entomopathogenic fungus. An increased demand for organic products since 2000 has stimulated work on isolation, characterization, mass production, formulation and certification of a number of microbial control agents. These are used in many crops and examples are microbial control of pest in potato and quinoa. Many of the quinoa pests are kept under natural control by predators and parasitoids, which has been well documented during the past 10 years. Currently most pests in sugarcane and soybean are under a combination of natural, augmentative and classical biocontrol.","PeriodicalId":355961,"journal":{"name":"Biological control in Latin America and the Caribbean: its rich history and bright future","volume":"482 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological control in Latin America and the Caribbean: its rich history and bright future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789242430.0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract A number of introductions of parasitoids and predators were carried out in the 1950s for classical biological control of olive scale, woolly apple aphid, white peach scale, Mediterranean fruit fly and Anastrepha fruit fly, with control of cottony cushion scale by the coccinellid Rodolia being a particular success. In 1963, dipteran natural enemies were introduced for the control of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp. Since 1963 native hymenopteran and dipteran parasitoids have been field collected and re-released for control of the borers. In 1969 an IPM programme of sugarcane borers was started, and biocontrol in sugarcane in the period 1970-2000 mainly consisted of augmentative releases of hymenopteran and tachinid parasitoids. Another successful IPM programme dealt with control of potato moth species with a product - now commercially available - that contains a native strain of the granulosis virus Baculovirus phthorimaea and a native strain of Bacillus thuringiensis. Coffee berry borer was brought under biocontrol in the 1990s by releasing a hymenopteran parasitoid and application of an entomopathogenic fungus. An increased demand for organic products since 2000 has stimulated work on isolation, characterization, mass production, formulation and certification of a number of microbial control agents. These are used in many crops and examples are microbial control of pest in potato and quinoa. Many of the quinoa pests are kept under natural control by predators and parasitoids, which has been well documented during the past 10 years. Currently most pests in sugarcane and soybean are under a combination of natural, augmentative and classical biocontrol.
玻利维亚的生物防治。
摘要20世纪50年代,为了防治橄榄蚧、绵苹果蚜、白桃蚧、地中海果蝇和灰蚜等害虫,在我国进行了大量拟寄生物和捕食者的引种,其中对棉垫蚧的控制尤为成功。1963年,为了防治甘蔗螟虫,引进了双翅目天敌Diatraea spp.。自1963年以来,为了防治甘蔗螟虫,在田间收集和释放了本地的膜翅目和双翅目寄生蜂。1969年开始实施甘蔗螟虫综合防治计划,1970-2000年甘蔗的生物防治主要是增加释放膜翅目寄生蜂和速食寄生蜂。另一个成功的综合管理方案涉及用一种产品(现已商业化)控制马铃薯蛾种类,该产品含有一种本地菌株的肉芽肿病毒杆状病毒和一种本地菌株的苏云金芽孢杆菌。20世纪90年代,通过释放一种膜翅目寄生蜂和应用一种昆虫病原真菌,咖啡浆果螟虫得到了生物防治。自2000年以来,对有机产品需求的增加刺激了许多微生物控制剂的分离、表征、大规模生产、配方和认证工作。这些方法被用于许多作物,例如马铃薯和藜麦的害虫微生物控制。许多藜麦害虫受到捕食者和拟寄生物的自然控制,这在过去10年中得到了充分的记录。目前甘蔗和大豆害虫的防治主要采用自然防治、强化防治和传统生物防治相结合的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信