Comparison of 4 different smoothness metrics for the quantitative assessment of movement's quality in the upper limb of subjects with cerebral palsy

V. Rincon Montes, Y. Quijano, J. E. Chong Quero, D. Villanueva Ayala, J. C. Perez Moreno
{"title":"Comparison of 4 different smoothness metrics for the quantitative assessment of movement's quality in the upper limb of subjects with cerebral palsy","authors":"V. Rincon Montes, Y. Quijano, J. E. Chong Quero, D. Villanueva Ayala, J. C. Perez Moreno","doi":"10.1109/PAHCE.2014.6849644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the results obtained by computing 4 different quantitative metrics for the assessment of the upper limb, using the elbow angle as the datum for the experiment. This angle was obtained from a commercial Motion Tracking system with 19 subjects: 10 with cerebral palsy (CP) and 9 with no neurological impairment. Subjects performed one task, consisting in reaching a small object (elbow extension) and bringing it to their mouths (elbow flexion). A MATLAB toolbox was implemented in order to compute the logarithmic dimensionless jerk metric, the mean arrest period ratio, the spectral arc-length metric and the peaks metric, as well as the maximum peak angle, minimum peak angle, maximum peak velocity, maximum peak acceleration and minimum angular acceleration. Results show the consistency of the spectral arc-length metric to display the differences between CP and healthy subjects, while the peaks metric and the logarithmic dimensionless jerk metric tend to be useful under some restrictions. With this analysis, a preliminary motor impairment assessment can be deducted, by comparing the metrics data from the CP subjects with the control group.","PeriodicalId":196438,"journal":{"name":"2014 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PAHCE.2014.6849644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article discusses the results obtained by computing 4 different quantitative metrics for the assessment of the upper limb, using the elbow angle as the datum for the experiment. This angle was obtained from a commercial Motion Tracking system with 19 subjects: 10 with cerebral palsy (CP) and 9 with no neurological impairment. Subjects performed one task, consisting in reaching a small object (elbow extension) and bringing it to their mouths (elbow flexion). A MATLAB toolbox was implemented in order to compute the logarithmic dimensionless jerk metric, the mean arrest period ratio, the spectral arc-length metric and the peaks metric, as well as the maximum peak angle, minimum peak angle, maximum peak velocity, maximum peak acceleration and minimum angular acceleration. Results show the consistency of the spectral arc-length metric to display the differences between CP and healthy subjects, while the peaks metric and the logarithmic dimensionless jerk metric tend to be useful under some restrictions. With this analysis, a preliminary motor impairment assessment can be deducted, by comparing the metrics data from the CP subjects with the control group.
4种不同平滑度指标定量评价脑瘫患者上肢运动质量的比较
本文讨论了以肘关节角度为实验基准,通过计算4种不同的上肢评估定量指标得到的结果。这个角度是从商业运动跟踪系统获得的,共有19名受试者:10名脑瘫(CP)患者,9名无神经损伤患者。受试者执行一项任务,包括拿到一个小物体(肘部伸展)并把它送到嘴里(肘部弯曲)。为了计算对数无量纲跳振度量、平均停顿时间比、谱弧长度量和峰度量,以及最大峰角、最小峰角、最大峰速度、最大峰加速度和最小角加速度,实现了MATLAB工具箱。结果表明,谱弧长度量在显示CP与健康受试者之间的差异方面具有一致性,而峰度量和对数无量纲跳度量在一定的限制条件下是有用的。通过这一分析,通过比较CP受试者与对照组的指标数据,可以得出初步的运动损伤评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信