Pesantren and Social Empowerment: A Critical Analysis On Pesantren Al-Imdad Yogyakarta And Pesantren Maslakul Huda Central Java

S. Widayanti
{"title":"Pesantren and Social Empowerment: A Critical Analysis On Pesantren Al-Imdad Yogyakarta And Pesantren Maslakul Huda Central Java","authors":"S. Widayanti","doi":"10.18784/analisa.v5i1.1055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poverty and social problems give rise to many different perspectives and analyzes related to the causative factors and their complexity. These differences have an impact on different social interventions conducted by various parties, including among pesantren in Indonesia. Using qualitative method, this study explores the perspectives and analysis of pesantren on poverty and community empowerment in two pesantrens organizing socio-economic empowerment programs for subordinate groups namely Pesantren Al-Imdad in Yogyakarta and Pesantren Maslakul Huda in Central Java. This research results in three types of analysis, i.e. conventional, semi-progressive and progressive. The conventional analysis defines poverty as community’s inability to meet their basic needs, caused by their own mistakes of not having skills and enterpreneurship so that empowerment is viewed as a tool to direct the community in accordance with the pesantren’s decisions of empowerment programs. The semi-progressive analysis defines poverty as a multidimenstional problem, caused by structural and human factors so that empowerment is viewed as a strategy to increase the capacity of community and pesantren. The progressive analysis defines poverty as multidimentional problem, caused by structural factors and community is seen as a victim of unjust system so that empowerment is viewed as pesantren's alignments to subordinate groups by organizing joint forces to fight for the rights and interests of the community.","PeriodicalId":102671,"journal":{"name":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v5i1.1055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Poverty and social problems give rise to many different perspectives and analyzes related to the causative factors and their complexity. These differences have an impact on different social interventions conducted by various parties, including among pesantren in Indonesia. Using qualitative method, this study explores the perspectives and analysis of pesantren on poverty and community empowerment in two pesantrens organizing socio-economic empowerment programs for subordinate groups namely Pesantren Al-Imdad in Yogyakarta and Pesantren Maslakul Huda in Central Java. This research results in three types of analysis, i.e. conventional, semi-progressive and progressive. The conventional analysis defines poverty as community’s inability to meet their basic needs, caused by their own mistakes of not having skills and enterpreneurship so that empowerment is viewed as a tool to direct the community in accordance with the pesantren’s decisions of empowerment programs. The semi-progressive analysis defines poverty as a multidimenstional problem, caused by structural and human factors so that empowerment is viewed as a strategy to increase the capacity of community and pesantren. The progressive analysis defines poverty as multidimentional problem, caused by structural factors and community is seen as a victim of unjust system so that empowerment is viewed as pesantren's alignments to subordinate groups by organizing joint forces to fight for the rights and interests of the community.
Pesantren与社会赋权:日惹和中爪哇Pesantren Maslakul Huda的批判分析
贫困与社会问题产生了许多不同的观点和分析,相关的原因及其复杂性。这些差异影响了各方进行的不同社会干预,包括印度尼西亚的妇女。本研究以日惹的pesantren Al-Imdad和中爪哇省的pesantren Maslakul Huda这两个为下属群体组织社会经济赋权项目的pesantren为研究对象,运用定性方法探讨和分析了pesantren对贫困和社区赋权的看法。本研究得出了常规、半渐进和渐进三种分析类型。传统的分析将贫困定义为社区无法满足他们的基本需求,这是由于他们自己没有技能和创业精神的错误造成的,因此赋权被视为一种工具,可以指导社区按照代表的决定进行赋权项目。半进步的分析将贫穷定义为一个多方面的问题,是由结构因素和人为因素造成的,因此赋予权力被视为提高社区和妇女能力的一项战略。进步的分析将贫困定义为多方面的问题,是由结构性因素造成的,社区被视为不公正制度的受害者,因此赋权被视为代表通过组织联合力量为社区的权利和利益而战而与下级群体结盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信