ASSESSING SOIL ERODABILITY FACTOR FOR RUSLE2 IN BAHLUIEȚ CATCHMENT, EASTERN ROMANIA

Cristian Todosi, Mihai Niculiță
{"title":"ASSESSING SOIL ERODABILITY FACTOR FOR RUSLE2 IN BAHLUIEȚ CATCHMENT, EASTERN ROMANIA","authors":"Cristian Todosi, Mihai Niculiță","doi":"10.15551/FPPZT.V14I1.520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Romania, there is a lack of methodology for soil erosion estimation, in the sense that although a soil loss estimation equation similar with USLE is used, the factor estimation is not comprehensively covered. That is why we have turned to RUSLE2 methodology to compute soil erodability factor (K) for Bahluieț catchment (Eastern Romania). We have used a soil profile and soil unit legacy database for estimating K values from granulometry sand, silt and clay values. We tested the two equations proposed by the RUSLE2 methodology, but we have chosen to use the values from only one of them, because for the other the estimated value were incomprehensibly high. For comparison, we have used also an estimation made by the EUROSOIL JRC and based on the same equation for which the estimation failed. The majority of the soils from the study area are from the clay loam, sandy clay loam, sandy loam and loamy texture classes. The mean K factor value is 0.0181, corresponding to soils with low erodability. The K values stretch from 0.01 to 0.03, the majority of the soils in the study area having K values in the range between 0.01 and 0.022. We observed a spatial pattern in K values distribution which is explained by the lithology of the study area, the central, southern and eastern areas having bigger soil erodability, because of the loamy texture, while western areas have a sandy loam texture, which give lower soil erodability values. Our result is lower than the estimation of EUROSOIL JRC modelling, which for our study area has a mean of 0.043, and the majority of values falling in the 0.026-0.054 range. Our opinion is that these values are too big, since the texture of the soils is clayey to sandy loam. This conclusion seems to be sustained also by the soil erosion values and sediment yields obtained using our estimated K values, which are consistent with the soil losses and sediment yields reported in the study area, conclusion which cannot be drawn for the estimation of EUROSOIL JRC data (which will give overestimated soil erosion and sediment yield values).","PeriodicalId":202276,"journal":{"name":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Forming Factors and Processes from the Temperate Zone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15551/FPPZT.V14I1.520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Romania, there is a lack of methodology for soil erosion estimation, in the sense that although a soil loss estimation equation similar with USLE is used, the factor estimation is not comprehensively covered. That is why we have turned to RUSLE2 methodology to compute soil erodability factor (K) for Bahluieț catchment (Eastern Romania). We have used a soil profile and soil unit legacy database for estimating K values from granulometry sand, silt and clay values. We tested the two equations proposed by the RUSLE2 methodology, but we have chosen to use the values from only one of them, because for the other the estimated value were incomprehensibly high. For comparison, we have used also an estimation made by the EUROSOIL JRC and based on the same equation for which the estimation failed. The majority of the soils from the study area are from the clay loam, sandy clay loam, sandy loam and loamy texture classes. The mean K factor value is 0.0181, corresponding to soils with low erodability. The K values stretch from 0.01 to 0.03, the majority of the soils in the study area having K values in the range between 0.01 and 0.022. We observed a spatial pattern in K values distribution which is explained by the lithology of the study area, the central, southern and eastern areas having bigger soil erodability, because of the loamy texture, while western areas have a sandy loam texture, which give lower soil erodability values. Our result is lower than the estimation of EUROSOIL JRC modelling, which for our study area has a mean of 0.043, and the majority of values falling in the 0.026-0.054 range. Our opinion is that these values are too big, since the texture of the soils is clayey to sandy loam. This conclusion seems to be sustained also by the soil erosion values and sediment yields obtained using our estimated K values, which are consistent with the soil losses and sediment yields reported in the study area, conclusion which cannot be drawn for the estimation of EUROSOIL JRC data (which will give overestimated soil erosion and sediment yield values).
评估罗马尼亚东部bahluieȚ流域rusle2的土壤可蚀性因子
在罗马尼亚,缺乏估算土壤侵蚀的方法,也就是说,虽然使用了与USLE类似的土壤流失估算方程,但没有全面涵盖因子估算。这就是为什么我们转向RUSLE2方法来计算bahluieii集水区(罗马尼亚东部)的土壤可蚀性因子(K)。我们已经使用了土壤剖面和土壤单位遗留数据库来估计从粒度计砂,粉土和粘土值的K值。我们测试了RUSLE2方法提出的两个方程,但我们选择只使用其中一个方程的值,因为对于另一个方程的估计值高得令人难以理解。为了进行比较,我们还使用了EUROSOIL JRC所做的估计,并且基于相同的估计失败的方程。研究区土壤主要为粘土壤土、砂质粘土壤土、砂质壤土和壤土。K因子均值为0.0181,为低侵蚀性土壤。研究区土壤K值在0.01 ~ 0.03之间,大部分土壤K值在0.01 ~ 0.022之间。研究区K值分布具有一定的空间格局,中部、南部和东部地区由于壤土质地而具有较大的土壤可蚀性,而西部地区为砂壤土质地,土壤可蚀性较低。我们的结果低于EUROSOIL JRC模型的估计,我们研究区域的平均值为0.043,大多数值在0.026-0.054范围内。我们的意见是这些值太大了,因为土壤的质地是粘土到沙质壤土。利用我们估计的K值得到的土壤侵蚀值和产沙量似乎也支持这一结论,该结论与研究区域报告的土壤流失量和产沙量一致,而EUROSOIL JRC数据的估计无法得出这一结论(这将高估土壤侵蚀和产沙量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信